Stanford Hires Atheist Chaplain

by Nathan Harden - Fix Editor on December 24, 2012

You would think that, of all people, atheists would be the last ones in need of chaplains. But Stanford University, taking a cue from Harvard, recently brought in an atheist to function as a chaplain to non-believing students.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, a professed atheist named John Figdor was recently hired at Stanford to, essentially, help students grow in their faithlessness, and to become firmer in their convictions that God does not exist.

Figdor has a seminary degree from Harvard Divinity school. He used to work as an atheist chaplain at Harvard before moving to the west coast to tell students the bad news that life has no meaning. We don’t see why Figdor needs a Divinity degree, considering how he does not believe in the existence of any divine being.

Apparently, many atheist students are also perplexed. Stanford graduate student Armand Rundquist told The Chronicle that many atheists aren’t interested in having a chaplain, which leads us to wonder why anyone bothered to hire one. Although, Rundquist did say there was at least one tangible benefit: “He got us some discount tickets to the atheist film festival in San Francisco.”

Cheap movie tickets–what else is an atheist chaplain good for?

As absurd as it seems to simply have an atheist chaplain, even more absurd is the story of how Figdor got to Stanford in the first place. A fellow named Rev. Scotty McLennan, Stanford’s dean for religious life, was the one who insisted that Stanford needed an atheist chaplain. McLennan helped lead the effort to get Figdor hired and brought to campus. He said this was especially important because Stanford’s Memorial Church, a centerpiece on campus, “had been founded on a principle of inclusion.”

Not so fast.

If you read a little about the church’s history, you learn that Jane Stanford, the woman who paid for the construction of the Memorial Church, also spurred the ouster of the church’s first minister, R. Herber Newton, only a few months after the church opened–all because his Christian theological teachings were too liberal. It’s true that the church was built to be a non-denominational Christian place of worship. But we hardly think Ms. Stanford’s vision of “inclusion,” when she donated all that money to the university, would have extended to the active spread of atheism among the student body. More likely, she’s turning over in her grave about now.

Nevertheless, the man in charge of religious life at Stanford today thinks an atheist chaplain is a great thing for students. According to his official bio, Dean McLennan is an ordained member of the Unitarian Universalist Church–an organization that describes itself as “a liberal religion that embraces theological diversity.” I guess we can deduce from the hiring of Mr. Figdor that, at least for Dean McLennan, “theological diversity” means that religion makes sense even for those who believe religion doesn’t make sense.

We think this is a perfect example of the absurdity of modern-day, evangelical-style atheism. The inherent self-contradiction of financing a robust religious infrastructure for those who insist that religion is pointless is truly ridiculous. The need these atheists feel to engage in religious assembly and ritual undermines the entire rationale of human self-sufficiency that so many atheists profess.
As it is written somewhere: Thinking themselves to be wise, they became fools.
  • http://www.facebook.com/bpuharic Bob Puharic

    Life has no meaning for atheists? Well, if they let an idiot write for “the College fix’ why not an atheist chaplain for Stanford?

    • Johnny_Layabout

      Life has no meaning for the atheist. Sartre said as much. More precisely he said, “Life has no meaning the moment you lose the illusion of being eternal.” Or, at least your life, being the product of the random machinations of the universe, has no more meaning than that of a dog. It’s a rather depressing prospect if one thinks about it. Fortunately, most modern atheists seem incapable of anything approaching deep thought, so it never occurs to them.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jacob.c.cohen Jacob Coby Cohen

        right on – they also refuse to acknowledge that morality is non-existant.without God it is merely (at times) very strong preferences.

        • katie

          I fear for the world that would live strictly by the morals contained within your God’s Bible. I’m very thankful we adopt alternative/edited/additional ideas.
          I, for one, am not going to get my dad drunk tonight in order to rape him and impregnate myself, but I guess if I want to acknowledge that morals only come from God I should probably break out the alcohol.

      • katie

        “One person said that life has no meaning for atheists so it must be true for all atheists.”
        This is certainly representative of the deep thought you accuse atheists of lacking.

    • David Patton

      Your boy Nietzsche said as much, Bob.
      Come from nothing, go to nothing, pretend there is meaning in between.
      What an absurd existence the humanist builds for himself.

  • yueh walker

    I would like to know whether the chaplain is an orthodox or reformed athiest

  • Skip

    Was this financed by stimulus money?

  • theGOONIES

    shhhh let them do more of this …………..then when they cry to the courts about other religious symbols, we can tell them its a violation of the constitution as an absence of religious symbols would be government support of a religion …………atheism

    you cant make this stuff up ………..thanks non thinkers

    • Will

      Absolutely correct. Atheism is a world view of “ultimate meaning,” therefore, a religion. The absence of a religious symbol, if absent due to atheist activity, is itself a religious statement, therefore, in violation of the First Amendment (if one agrees with the atheistic view of the separation of Church and State).

      • TheyAreAReligiousEntity

        They held their first church service on Jan 6, 2013, in London. There are plans to build a temple in the center of the London financial district. They also claim themselves as a non-profit entity, you know, a corporation, 501, 3(c). They are a religion, and I love it! They use the federal government to force established and historical religious entities into abandoning the tenants of their beliefs for that of the atheist religion. Atheism now seems to be a government backed religion and unconstitutionally forcing itself on the American people.

  • TheyFileAsANonProfit

    I love it! It keeps getting better! On Jan 6, 2013, the first atheist church service was held in London. They will have service once a month, have a speaker to give a sermon, and they are a non-profit church. There is a gentleman who is trying to collect a million Pounds (that’s English money) to build a temple located in the very center of London’s financial district. The temple will have one door, have the binary code written on the outside, and a thin gold band that represents the span of humanity’s existence on the face of the earth.

    These people file lawsuits all over the country under the guise that they are offended by Christian emblems, the Bible, prayer, the 10 Commandments, and any suggestion of any Hristian religion. Yet, they decide to meet on a university campus to spread their message of intolerance to anything they do not agree with. It is classified as religious intolerance, religious discrimination, failing to comply with separation of church and state. I hope thousands of religious organizations file a lawsuit against the Atheists for their discrimination and acts of hate toward believers of God.