Girl Denied Admission to All-Male College

by College Fix Staff on January 18, 2013

A teenage girl who hoped to gain admission to a tiny, all-male, Deep Springs College, has been denied. She has written an essay expounding on her disappointment for The Atlantic.

A legally-binding trust stipulates that the college must remain an all-male institution. The rejected female applicant doesn’t like this. Oddly, however, she has no problem with all-female institutions rejecting men.

Despite the complex trust law issues and the ongoing court case, the issue to me is simple. Young women aren’t able to apply to a school like Deep Springs, and we should be.

Joseph Liburt, Kinch Hoekstra’s attorney, told the website Inside Higher Ed that “The case is about asking the court ‘to uphold the value of diversity in higher education,’ so that those male and female students who want single-sex education can find it.” This argument troubles me.

The fact of the matter is that young women face a lack of diversity in their higher education. Young men do not pine over all-women schools like Bryn Mawr or Scripps because there are reasonably similar co-educational programs. However, there is not a school like Deep Springs that is available to young women.

Shouldn’t private colleges be allowed to decide whether or not they want to remain single-sex? Are we going to file lawsuits to abolish all single-sex colleges whether male or female? And why is it that all-male institutions are constantly pressured to go co-ed, but all-female institutions aren’t?

Our recommendation is: Leave Deep Springs alone. There are more than 4,000 other colleges to choose from.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

  • rich__b

    Reading the article I only see one thing. How she herself doesn’t see she isn’t the student that school is looking for. They would be rejecting her even if she was a man.

    On to the other issues this brings up. The founders of that college had a vision. One of part was an all male school. They may seem outdated and backwards to some now a days. But why do these people think they have the right to change these PRIVATE institutions? It seems like it going to be hard in the future for organizations and institutions to be permitted to keep doing what they were intended to do. The world is far too full of busy bodies who stick their noses in other peoples business. Thankfully that school is a trust, so even those people inside that school that wanted to change it were unable to do so.

    If there is going to be all women’s schools, there should be all men’s schools too. Why the hypocrisy against male schools?

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.h.baker2 Jennifer Herrgesell Baker

    Rich, I couldn’t agree more. Women are just so used to everything being about them and their feelings that they can’t see outside their narcissistic lunchboxes. I’m glad the school was able to remain “all male”. Thank goodness they had a strong trust established preventing women from enrolling.

  • Mark

    Evidently the Trustees don’t think the Trust is completely unbreakable, as the they voted in 2011 to admit women starting in 2013. This action is currently being fought by at least one lawsuit, which has received an injunction that would delay the admission of women until at least the 2014-15 school year. Let’s hope the rule of law wins out over political correctness.