Anti-Feminism Men’s Group at ASU Prompts Angst

by Jennifer Kabbany - Associate Editor on March 1, 2013

A 3-year-old student organization at Arizona State University called ‘Men’s Rights Movement Group,’ which argues with extreme rhetoric against feminism, has prompted female students in recent weeks to voice anger and frustration over its message and tone.

Throughout February, female students tore down and covered up the Men’s Rights Movement campus posters, and wrote in to the State Press student newspaper to criticize the group.

“The MRMG is a hate group directed toward females, particularly those fork-tongued ‘feminazis’ who believe in gender equality and the empowerment of the modern woman,” writes Isabelle Novak in her Feb. 27 column. “Although the majority of the website’s content is now missing or disabled, the homepage displays colorful paragraphs of text insulting straight women, lesbians and gays. … Morris’ opening paragraph calls MRMG non-religious, then continues on to call homosexuality ‘the most nefarious kind of gender warfare conceivable.’ ”

Novak adds the group’s homepage “includes a radical and offensive quote from a woman who rants that females are superior and that male babies should be aborted.”

“Morris referred to her as the ‘typical lesbian,’ categorizing all lesbians as man-hating and irrational; the link to this quote is disabled,” Novak reports. “Amid the sexist jargon and biblical references, Morris said, ‘Feminism has really done nothing for women.’ ”

In addition the column, in mid-February the State Press ran an article that quoted several female students who said they have covered and ripped the group’s campus posters. Apparently some men have also joined the cause because they disagree with the group’s extreme message, the women told the student newspaper.

English freshman Nicole Lemme told the State Press she has made new signs to cover the posters that say things like “smash the patriarchy” and “gender rules hurt everybody.”

“I consider (tearing them or covering them) an act of symbolic speech,” Lemme told the State Press. “While it’s free speech to put them up, it’s also free speech to tear them down.”

But a law professor quoted in the article states tearing down the posters is a violation of the mens group’s First Amendment rights.

In a March 2012 State Press article on the group, headlined “Mad Men,” student founder Zachary Morris is paraphrased as saying its purpose is to “both provoke a response from people and to provide them with the opportunity to ‘say they don’t officially agree with the official line of gender study.’ ”

Some of the statements on his fliers that year argued feminism “suspects all men and males as pedophiles, rapists, or criminals,” “treats men like subhuman slaves in family courts and the justice system” and “sits idly as 99 percent of deaths in war are men and 94 percent of deaths in industry are male.”

“We are trying to provoke a response, we’re trying to motivate people who otherwise might not care, and we’re trying to do it in a teasing, playful way,” Morris told the State Press. “We’re not trying to polarize things.”

In a 2011 email to Jezebel.com, Morris stated: “I believe gender warfare is the root of all societal problems, and a keen lens from which to understand all human affairs. While there are many women’s groups and gender focus on women in college courses and on campus there are none for men. So I decided to start one to give this perspective and knowledge-base a voice.”

Morris told Jezebel his group’s membership is low. Novak claims he may be the only member.

While the group has been on campus for several years, the State Press opinion column and poster-defacing incidents in February illustrate its presence it still a hot-button issue.

A top blog post on the group’s homepage states: “This group is being censored, as has any free speech for men’s rights on campus. Fliers have been vandalized, and crimes committed against my private property by students and faculty members. Litigation is in process, and lawsuits against the school and offenders is possible. This is not over. It has just begun.”

Jennifer Kabbany is Associate Editor of The College Fix.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

IMAGE: Jay Morrison/Flickr

  • rich__b

    Only shows how stupid these little groups are, and that’s probably the point of the men’s rights group. And why there shouldn’t be any of them.
    Its discrimination just as much to have a woman’s group but not allow a men’s group. Or to have a black group but not a white group.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lee-Poteet/564594813 Lee Poteet

    Women, for the most part, are entitlement w****s. The prophetess of the feminist movement wrote her book as the wife of a hard working and wealthy husband. The modern single woman wants someone else to pick her bills and uses the Democrat run governments to do just that. Unfortunately that has the effect of making the rest of us slaves. But do liberals and leftists care? No, not at all On the other hand, we should.

  • maxparrish

    History is his-story. There is no her story. Nobody liked the uppity blacks during civil rights or uppity women voting. No one likes the ‘in-your-face’ gays.
    But the common denominator is those blacks and women and gays weren’t going to be invited nicely into the status quo. So really, does women voting really bother anyone any more.
    Many women and children are killed in war, but wars are mainly men’s doing. How many women die in childbirth.
    In the US women have elected to fight in combat. What will that do to cherry picked stats.
    I do agree with industrial accidents. Men dominate those fields just by strength and because they are higher paying. So of course women are not present to be killed or injured.
    But on the otherhand how many women die in domestic violence. Women don’t need war or accidents to kill them.

    • terry_zimmerman

      Almost no women die in childbirth in this country, usually they are in danger only if they are underage, or malnourished (usually drug addicts). Other than that, separating the occasional surprise heart attack (no different than the surprise heart attack of the athlete who drops dead on the field or the surprise heart attack of the 30-year-old distance runner) childbirth is a very safe enterprise. No reason not to be, it’s our bodies’ natural action.

      • maxparrish

        Rather myopic. Women die in childbirth all of the time. I would have had I lived in a third world country. My children would have never fit through the pelvic structure. They die of hemoraging, preeclampsia, or duress on the the child.
        You have facts to back yourself up with, then?

        • http://www.facebook.com/wendy.chatham Wendy Chatham

          Um, it is always a woman who dies during childbirth, unless the baby dies too (and it is a male). Thanks to men in the field of medical science my two youngest children survived childbirth, both males, and they are both hardworking, kind adults. I happen to like men. My husband is 15 years younger than I am, he is gender specific, and I like it that way. I do not have to work full time while pursuing my degree. He works his ass off to give me a great lifestyle and I happen to appreciate it. Therefore I keep our home clean, am a great cook, and maintain a social circle. And there is nothing wrong with it.

    • John Stevens

      The point of all this was to underscore just how far over the edge of sanity feminism has gone.

      Farce and satire may not be high art, but they can be effective forms of political communication.

      Your opening line just proves my point. History has women’s stories, and has since Genesis, yet we get this over the top assertion that women’s history has somehow been suppressed, and this silly statement that wars are “mostly men’s doing.”

      What, exactly, do you suppose men fight for? Rationally, if wars are mostly men’s doing, then history will be mostly about what men do. Yet if you dig into any actual history, you will see many stories of women, including the two most important women in history. The facts don’t support the feminist rant.

      But perhaps I’m biased because I belong to the most woman friendly institution in human history: The Catholic Church.

      • maxparrish

        Thank you for the best guffaw all day. First, to say the Catholics are women friendly. Second, the say the occasional woman noted in history is even a chicken scratch.

        Notice the “silly statement”, “feminist rant” and “Farce and satir” in your condescending attitude. That is all any need to hear.

        And biblical examples of womanhood are just cookie cutter archetypes of the weak fallen woman, secondary to man or a wicked queen who has a fondness for heads.
        All pretty much secondary to the principle character.

        In the Hebrew and Aramaic scriptures there are Queens of the Jews, but none in the Greek scriptures- written about Jesus. And Paul was anti- woman.

        • http://twitter.com/bizarro_obama bizarro obama

          And your jeering anti-religious bigotry is all a reader needs to hear to completely dismiss you. Thank you for your silly rant.

          • maxparrish

            Aww! I’m butt-hurt!

  • EastAsianNationalist

    What’s the matter, feminists can’t handle what they dish out?

    Anti-feminism is just another word for common sense.