Original. Student reported. Your daily dose of Right-minded news and commentary from across the nation
‘The American outer class’: Professor explains to peers why Trump won

Editor’s Note: This is the second in a series of articles reporting on the American Studies Association’s annual meeting, an academic conference held Nov. 9-12 in Chicago.

CHICAGO – Believe it or not, Trump voters feel oppressed too, according to one scholar.

If academics want to fully understand why so many Americans voted for Donald Trump, an Indiana University professor says it’s time they more fully grasp how feelings of resentment and marginalization influence all Americans and their class consciousness — not just people of color or the LGBT community.

Colin Johnson, a gender studies professor, said at a recent academic conference that reconceptualizing how scholars measure social class can better account for why Americans vote the way they do. Specifically, he called for a new class structure built around one’s distance from power rather than being based simply on wealth and privilege.

Such a model, Johnson said, sheds light onto what he called “the American outer class,” a group drawn to Trump because he resonated with them and their own experiences.

“They didn’t help to put Trump in the White House because they think he belongs there. They helped to put him in the White House precisely because they understand that he will never really belong there, at least in the eyes of people they see as unjustly entitled to pass such judgments,” Johnson said at the American Studies Association’s annual meeting, recently held in Chicago and dedicated to exploring “pedagogies of dissent.”

At a session titled “WTF Rural America? Geography. Culpability. Trump.,”Johnson told his peers they should tinker with the traditional top-to-bottom social class structure that puts the wealthy at the highest point and poor at bottom. He argued the traditional model is poor at predicting voting patterns and doesn’t fully tease out the frustration currently felt by many Americans and exhibited in last year’s election.

“Specifically, I would suggest we need to stop thinking about class in terms of vertically oriented hierarchy and start thinking of it instead in terms of perceived proximity to or distance from centers of power, be they real or imagined,” he said.

Centering social class around one’s distance to power, the scholar says, better captures feelings of resentment and underrepresentation — two factors Johnson suggested played a major role in last year’s presidential election.

“My point is ultimately that pretty much all Americans today feel marginalized in someway or at least marginal relative to someone or something or someplace else,” Johnson said.

Johnson, the author of “Just Queer Folks: Gender and Sexuality in Rural America,” argued that voters today are more frequently voting against candidates rather than for a specific politician. He highlighted conversations with voters in his Illinois hometown who opposed Hillary Clinton in last year’s presidential election because “she really seems to belong in New York.”

And while Trump also hails from New York, the billionaire resonated with the so-called “American outer class” because he has similar characteristics.

“They think he acts like they do,” Johnson said. “In short, these members of the American outer class didn’t support Trump because they think he’s perfect. They supported him because they think he’s flawed.”

MORE: Professor — Liberals must take partial responsibility for Trump presidency

IMAGE: alphaspirit/Shutterstock

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

About the Author
Nathan Rubbelke is a staff reporter for The College Fix with a specialty on investigative and enterprise reporting. He has also held editorial positions at The Commercial Review daily newspaper in Portland, Indiana, as well as at The Washington Examiner, Red Alert Politics and St. Louis Public Radio. Rubbelke graduated from Saint Louis University, where he majored in political science and sociology.

Add to the Discussion

  • fishydude

    In a bit of irony, these a man is only accepted as a ‘woman’ if he dresses in a manner the feminist say is sexist and driven by the patriarchy. Dresses, make up, long hair, big fake boobs.
    They’d never allow a man to attend classes that wears jeans. work boots, flannel, a crew cut and identifies as lesbian.

  • Tom

    Could these liberal dorks be any lamer? Go ahead, change your academic models, I’m sure your sociology students will be very impressed. Do you actually believe that it will make the slightest ounce of difference to us (Trump voters)? I’ve got news for this guy: the fact that useless eggheads like him are paid (frequently from tax payer money) to stare at their navels all day, while looking down on those of us who actually work, is a contributing factor to Trump’s victory.

  • dislikedisqus

    Sounds intelligent. They’ll never listen to him.

  • JF

    What is “quaintly bizarre” here is a paper who has someone who thinks they are an assistant editor when they are just a bigot with a computer.

  • SterlingMaloryArcher

    It seems like a decent point of view… Certainly more wise than denouncing any Trump supporter as “deplorable”, ignorant, or racist.