Aslinn Scott - University of Colorado Boulder

Nearly 50 students at the University of Colorado at Boulder have signed a large, colorful “Thank You” card to the IRS for stonewalling conservative groups’ efforts to obtain nonprofit status.

“Yes – I’ll sign it – because I think it’s a fake scandal and it makes sense to prosecute the 501cs, or whatever it is,” said one male student as he signed the card, which was essentially a poster board with the words “Thank You IRS!” in bright, block lettering.

“Oh sure!” said another male student as he added his signature. “I think this is pretty rad.”

The card – which also included an image of President Obama giving a thumbs up and some balloons, was fake – although students who signed it did not realize it at the time. The card was created by Colorado conservative activist Caleb Bonham, a 2011 graduate of CU Fort Collins who was an active College Republican as an undergrad.

The signatures were obtained on various parts of the campus Tuesday, and the undertaking was videotaped as a publicity effort by Bonham, who aims to highlight the Western Conservative Summit conference slated for Colorado in late July as well as call attention to what colleges fail to teach students, he said.

“This really demonstrates the need for limited government and conservative principles amongst our youth,” Bonham said in an interview with The College Fix. “Government using its enforcement arm to target groups. That is tyranny. If students don’t recognize it, then we are in a lot of trouble.”

He said only two students declined to sign the card.

The 2-minute video has since gone viral, with 19,500-plus views and counting. It also aired on Fox News on Wednesday night.

Bonham said when he started the project he did not know how people were going to react on campus, but that he hoped students would be able to think critically about the situation. He added he was wrong – students were all for it.

“I actually read about that and thought it was funny,” said one female student as she signed it. “The IRS was doing the right thing, but the wrong thing at the same time.”

Another student even said “I love discrimination!” and gave a fist pump in the air after he signed the card.

A total of 45 signatures was collected in a short amount of time, Bonham said, adding he does not have plans with the card as of yet.

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

Watch the video:

{ 4 comments }

Lately Colorado, considered by some the nation’s hotspot for the natural energy drilling boom, has become obsessed with making frac’ing sense, with environmentalists and pro-business groups alike vying for supporters.

Much of that battle is played out at the state’s public universities.

Case in point - the University of Colorado at Boulder – where several green and fossil free environmental groups during the spring semester offering workshops and speakers to encourage students to join the anti-fracking and environmental justice movement.

One such workshop was dubbed “Stop the Frack Attack” and sponsored by StopTheFrackAttack.org. The discussion group “Fracking-A Messy Business” was hosted by the Assembly for Sustainability and Equity group.

Meanwhile, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper – who famously drank fracking fluid to prove it was harmless – gave a presentation on “Frac’ing Sense” at the university.

Hickenlooper is among those who aim to counter the sustainable proclamations and green peace efforts in Boulder and present some frac’ing truth.

He is not alone. Professors, in fact, have joined his cause, most notably from the Colorado School of Mines, where educators there work to inform the masses on frac’ing, and counter the argument it’s harmful to the environment.

Dr. Will Fleckenstein, BP adjuct professor at Colorado School of Mines, specializes in unconventional reservoirs, and actually worked as a roughneck on drilling rigs. He is quick to point out that, by using best practices, frac’ing is actually safe and effective.

Backing him up are groups such as the Colorado Women’s Alliance, which on Wednesday screened “FrackNation,” a pro-drilling film, at a downtown Boulder hotel.

Not to be outdone, the anti-frac’ing film “Gasland 2” was shown Wednesday night at CU Boulder by nearly two dozen environmental groups, including the Sierra Club and New Era Colorado.

As the debate in Colorado rages on, Debbie Brown, Director of Colorado Women’s Alliance, told The College Fix it was important for this event to bring insights to women about these issues.

“Women in particular often fall prey to an extreme environmental agenda, and it’s important to offer a fact-based educational documentary that offers a different view on these important energy issues, like the film, FrackNation,” Brown said.

She added: “America is more secure when we produce our own safe, affordable, clean and abundant energy. Our energy entrepreneurs should be encouraged to innovate and explore new development that will decrease our need for foreign dependence and provide economic prosperity for American families.”

Brown’s sentiment about informing communities about frac’ing is shared by students who will be working in the oil and natural gas industries.

Carlton Healy, 22 and recent graduate from Colorado School of Mines with a civil engineering specialty, has experience in the design of hydraulic fracture stimulations and will be working at a petroleum company full time.

Healy said frac’ing is vital for society.

“Conventional oil and gas reservoirs are becoming harder to access thanks to engineering and geo-political challenges,” he told The Fix. “Thus the prospect of developing domestic unconventional reservoirs is becoming more and more viable thanks to hydraulic fracture stimulations.”

“Through hydraulic fracture stimulations, which are economically essential to these ‘new’ reservoirs, the United States could become much more energy independent by producing petroleum domestically,” Healy added.

Healy said the term “fracking” is incorrect when referring to the industry.

“Frac’ing, not fracking,” Healy said. “There’s no ‘K’ in Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation; it’s a pet peeve of mine and others in industry.”

Colorado School of Mines’ Fleckenstein’s gave a presentation in December of 2011 in Brussels for The Atlantic Council and Goldwyn Global Strategies workshop called “Best Practices in Exploration: Drilling, Casing and Cementing.”

The presentation included data on the process of horizontal frac’ing drilling practices and their effectiveness at retrieving shale deposits.

Essentially the process of frac’ing is to start with drilling vertically and then change the direction by rotating the bit with a downhole motor, or a rotary steerable system. This then opens up the shale reserve to multiple access points in which the resource can be obtained.

Chemicals that are blended together with sand and water are inserted into the perforations, or drilled fractures, that were drilled in the well. Natural fractures begin to form from the perforations, which are kept open by proppant, or padding chemical.

Continuous drilling happens with the perforating gun in stages. The natural pressurized gases are monitored throughout the drilling. The chemicals and their fluids are then retrieved to begin the actual drilling of shale.

David Neslin, director of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, has stated that “to the knowledge of the (commission) staff, there has been no verified instance of harm to groundwater caused by hydraulic fracturing in Colorado.”

Meanwhile, anti-fracking and environmental justice movement groups continue to insist the harm is real and catastrophic, and they’re recruiting students to grow their ranks.

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

IMAGE: Kate Ausburn/Flickr

{ 1 comment }

Colorado voters may have recently approved the recreational use of marijuana, but CU Boulder leaders still snuffed out the college’s notorious 4/20 pro-pot rally, in which thousands of marijuana enthusiast traditionally descend on the campus to hotbox its quad.

On Saturday, a strong police presence and plenty of advance warnings kept pot lovers away from the university’s large quad, effectively shutting down the annual party that in 2011 helped get CU Boulder named Playboy magazine’s top party school in the nation.

Reefer-smoking students and other marijuana aficionados instead traveled to Denver, where the city’s Civic Center hosted thousands of pot smokers whose party was cut short after two adults were shot in the leg, according to police.

As for CU Boulder, Saturday marked the second consecutive year campus officials have been able to stop the smoke out by requiring visitors to show a campus ID and threatening trespassing citations with possible jail time, among other measures.

In interviews with The College Fix, students voiced mixed reactions to administrators’ actions.

“I heard that it was ridiculous trying to get into campus,” junior Dianne Callaghan, 20, said of the security measures. “I think all parts of 4/20 are unnecessary.”

Senior Julian Adorney, 22, said he supported the campus smoke out, that administrators should have let it take place.

“I am supportive of students’ actions,” Adorney said. “Allow the community to come together to celebrate this iconic event.”

Adorney added the university should not have to worry about its image, and that the preventive actions actually hurt their public image more.

“CU is an iconic research institution and an exceptionally prestigious public school,” Adorney said. “I don’t think one protest, one day of the year changes that.”

But in a statement from campus officials, they noted voters’ decision to legalize marijuana in the state did not legalize smoking the herb on the CU Boulder campus.

“Amendment 64 doesn’t legalize pot smoking in public or possession of marijuana by those under 21,” campus officials stated. “Marijuana is still prohibited by campus policy.”

An email to students from the chancellor also noted federal law considers marijuana use illegal.

Some students, such as senior Lilly Rapson, said they supported administrators’ decision to crack down.

“I respect the university’s decision for not wanting the 4/20 celebration on campus,” said Rapson, 21. “It hurts CU’s reputation, as many people only acknowledge it as a party school for this reason.”

For their part, student government members said they are not thrilled with the security measures, but “we hope that in future years we can keep the campus open, minimize the police presence, remove the need for ID checks, and open a dialogue about drug policies and related topics within our community.”

University officials even set up an email to address inquires and concerns: [email protected]. Meanwhile, lawmakers continue to work on implementing new laws to regulate the recreational use of marijuana in Colorado.

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

IMAGE: Cupcake/Flickr

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

{ 0 comments }

Free-market ideals, union-busting efforts and greedy capitalists stole the American dream, but a prioritization on fairness and an equalization of incomes can save this country, argued Hedrick Smith, a Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times journalist and best-selling author, in a recent speech at CU Boulder.

The divide between the have and the have-nots must diminish, said Smith during his keynote address at the university as it hosted the 65th annual Conference on World Affairs last week.

“We must make a democracy, or have wealth concentrated in the few – we can’t have both,” Smith said during his speech at the conference, which drew participants from across the globe for intellectual discussions, forums and debates.

Hundreds of students and scholars from across the nation attended Smith’s keynote address, which he fashioned after his recently published book, “Who Stole the American Dream?”

The book offers an analysis of U.S. political and economic trends over the last half-century, and it argues in part that capitalism was formally based on the ideals of fairness and sharing the wealth.

Smith said capitalistic business owners in the 1940s through the 1970s held such notions of equality, and during those years median incomes increased by leaps and bounds.

“Business owners … were fair and smart to share the wealth,” Smith said. “This business ethos is lost.”

Smith argued that the business ethos they had and that America should adopt, again, is stakeholder capitalism.

“Balance interests of everyone involved,” Smith said.

Since American business owners no longer honor this practice, the country continues to further be divided by class, he said.

“We have a divided society,” Smith said. “We are divided by ideology, money, and power.”

With that, Smith said, the middle class is losing its political power because of this continuing division, and creating the wealth inequalities seen today.

“In America, we accept inequality of income as a good thing,” Smith said, “but it’s out of whack.”

Smith cited opponents of trade unions and champions of free enterprise among D.C. lobbyists and lawmakers in the late 1970s who helped dismantle some of the trade unions as the beginnings of much of the problem.

“Unions are the underpinning of the middle class,” Smith said.

Lawmakers further hurt the working class, Smith argued, by changing tax laws to benefit the wealthy, favoring corporate business over trade unions. He said that ultimately hurt the purchasing power of middle class America. Smith then went on to attack the Reagan administration.

“Three trillion dollars was added to the wealthy class under Reagan,” Smith noted. “One trillion dollars was under Bush.”

Smith said America, like Rome and Greece, is on a precipice, and whose future looks “terminal and fatal” because the current economic system is now lopsided.

Smith mentioned his book has a “Ten Point Program to Save America,” and urged the audience to change the political system.

“We have got to become active, again,” Smith declared. “Martin Luther King said during his speech on ‘The March on Washington,’ that is not widely remembered: ‘We all have an equal shot at life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”

Smith noted the March of Washington was spurred because of Rosa Parks’ refusing to go to the back of the bus, and that resilience is the same thing Americans must do to change the political landscape.

“This day, and this is the time, where we aren’t moving to the back of the bus,” Smith said.

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

CLICK HERE to LIKE The College Fix on Facebook.

{ 0 comments }

Hell must have frozen over in the People’s Republic of Boulder.

Steven Hayward was recently announced as the Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy at the University of Colorado at Boulder, well-known among locals and others across the nation as a bastion of leftist thought.

In an interview with The College Fix, Hayward said he’s ready to enter the fray.

“I want to fill in the missing gap at the university, the missing conservative gap,” Hayward said. “Liberal professors teach conservative thought well, but I have a better understanding of conservative thought.”

Hayward said he hopes his selection will make a positive impact at the university in a number of ways, from leveling out academic disparity on campus to helping students get a broader academic experience.

Hayward noted that there are very few conservatives in academia, such as in the humanities departments in Yale and Berkeley. Likewise, CU Boulder lacks conservative scholars as well, he said.

“There are not many conservatives with academic credentials,” Hayward said. “Conservatives drop out of higher education.”

His addition should be a welcome change at a campus that values free speech and a well-rounded education, he said, adding he is eager to connect with and teach CU students this fall.

“Good classroom teaching is an art,” Hayward said.

CU Boulder President Bruce Benson, in an interview with The College Fix, voiced his excitement for the Conservative Thought program taking shape at last.

“I am passionate about this,” the president said. “I believe in a diversity of thought and good, honest political discussion.”

President Benson added that both liberal-minded faculty members and well–known conservatives in Colorado came together to set up the program. The Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy is a three-year pilot program supported by private funds. More than 20 donors have raised $1 million to support the program, according to campus officials.

“Faculty came together for this,” President Benson said.

Hayward is tentatively scheduled to teach four undergraduate courses, three in political science — Constitutional Law 1 and 2 plus a course in American Political Thought — and one in environmental studies, Free-Market Environmentalism.

Some students said they are thrilled with the new professor’s pending arrival.

Junior Zoe Bernstein, 21, said she is excited about the prospect of having a Conservative Thought program at CU, even if she is nearing the end of her academic career there.

“It is necessary in a few ways,” Bernstein told The Fix. “CU Boulder has a liberal reputation, and professors are not openly conservative.”

Bernstein added that she saw Hayward’s lecture before he was selected and felt he was the right candidate for the job.

“I heard his lecture on conservative environmentalism, and he was shattering stereotypes about conservatives,” she said. “He challenged preconceived notions people might have had.”

Hayward said there are significant issues with the environment that conservatives should pay attention too, but it’s not global warming.

“Climate change is not a significant issue,” Hayward said. “Biodiversity and extinction is more important. Yet it’s been ignored by the media and the political class for some time.”

Professor Hayward expressed that during his time at CU he would like to develop relationships with his students on an informal basis, as well as work on several publications, including new books and articles.

“This is a new challenge, and I am looking forward to enjoying the experience,” he said.

Hayward, currently a professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu, Calif., often hosts lectures across the country. He holds a Ph.D. in American Studies from Claremont Graduate School and has been the F.K. Weyerhaeuser Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he was principal author and project director of the think tank’s “Energy and Environment Outlook.”

Hayward’s essays have been published in The Washington Post, National Review, The Weekly Standard and several other publications. He has also published numerous books, including “Mere Environmentalism: A Biblical Perspective on Humans and the Natural World” and “A Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents: FDR to Obama.”

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

CLICK HERE to LIKE The College Fix on Facebook.

IMAGE: U.S. Army/Flickr

 

{ 2 comments }

A recent “Tunnel of Oppression” student exhibit at CU Boulder that aimed to highlight insulting and derogatory words and images included among its offerings a picture of an angry-looking Bill O’Reilly, implying the Fox News anchor is a perpetrator of such demagoguery.

The photo of the newsman included the words “lynching party against Michelle Obama” in bold, large white letters. The photo also indicates it was taken from a video on FoxAttacks.com, a website with a tagline, “they distort, we reply.”

The video in question highlights what some perceived to be hostile reporting toward Michelle Obama on Fox News leading up to the 2008 election, although ironically the audio clip of O’Reilly it includes has the newsman saying: “and I don’t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama.”

The video then cuts to a definition of lynching, noting “after the Civil War, southern whites used lynching to terrorize and intimidate freed blacks who were voting and assuming political power.”

But it appears O’Reilly – one of the most public faces of Fox News – is an oppressor, at least according to the exhibit, which was showcased last week on campus.

An estimated 1,000 people toured the three-day event, put on by a student diversity program centered at a LGBTQ-friendly dorm within the university and the ISM group, or Injustice Stops with Me.

Its goal, organizers said, is to raise awareness and take a stand against hate.

The O’Reilly photo was among hundreds of other offerings hung along the tunnel that organizers said showed examples of homophobia, ableism, ageism, transphobia, religious oppression, racism, body image, xenophobia, sexism, racism and bias.

Organizers encourage professors to send students to the annual exhibit, now in its eighth year, which has cut outs of supposedly offensive pictures and advertisements found in magazines and on websites. It also has slang words and the definitions of all the “isms” it aims to fight pinned along black curtains strung together to create a long tunnel for visitors to walk through.

As guests took in the passage last week, organizers doled out sunglasses with the words “See Life Through a Different Lens.” The students who meandered through the tunnel remained mostly silent and solemn.

A “speak-up section” at the end of the tour advised students on how they can join the fight against oppression.

CU Boulder sophomore Gianni Franceschi, 20, said in an interview with The College Fix that tunnel told the true story of how racism and other phobias are inherent within society.

“There are many advertisements out there about oppression and racism, and a lot of those advertisements were making racism look like it was a joke and not a serious matter,” she said.

Junior Anastasia Davis, 21, told The Fix the displays were powerful and moving.

“I almost cried,” Davis said. “Especially seeing the writing in the bathrooms in (the campus library).”

Other students, however, were less impressed with the display and thought the images hurt the goal of the tunnel to combat oppression.

Freshman Will O’Bryan, 18, said that the tunnel offered many run of the mill photos and advertisements, yet the examples were construed as racist and homophobic by hypersensitive exhibit organizers who see hate where there is none.

“The issues they are presenting are noncontroversial, but it’s clear they are looking at it from a left-wing agenda,” O’Bryan said.

O’Bryan added the tunnel’s pictures of comments in the library’s bathroom stalls were laughable.

“It’s a ballroom wall,” he said. “What are you expecting to find there?”

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

{ 9 comments }