Civil Rights

Faculty and students from Hood College, as well as local residents, took part in a “March on Frederick (Maryland)” early yesterday.

Supposedly evoking “the same spirit” as the famous 1963 March on Washington, more than 1,200 trekked roughly two miles through the Maryland town.

There was just one … “minor” issue: Attendance at the march for some students was mandatory. The Frederick News-Post reports (emphasis added):

Helena Hammond-DoDoo, a senior at Hood, called the march a great concept that needed better execution. Participation was mandatory for some student groups whether people were truly interested or not, she said.

“If we have absent-minded people sitting here not really listening, what have we really done?” she said.

Many students, like freshman Katie Hippert, said they view civil rights as “freedom for everyone.”

Emilie had a more clear-cut definition: “the right for anyone to go and do whatever they please, as long as it’s lawful.”

Hammond-DoDoo said she believes equality is so broad now that it is difficult to achieve. People should drop preconceived notions and adhere to the basic principle of “treat others the way you want to be treated,” she said.

Walter Olson at Free State Notes offers:

Expecting people to join a cause march whether they are inclined to or not. Expecting them to join a flag salute and pledge of allegiance whether they are inclined to or not. Similarities/differences?

Read the full Frederick News-Post article here.

h/t to Instapundit.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Emily Mills/Flickr

(Note: This post has been UPDATED. See below.) reports that Sunil Dutta, a professor of homeland security and criminal justice at Colorado Technical University, has faced a great deal of criticism for his recent Washington Post column titled “I’m a cop. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t challenge me.”

“Even though it might sound harsh and impolitic, here is the bottom line: if you don’t want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you,” he wrote.

Dutta cautions against arguing, insulting, or screaming at officers, “and don’t even think of aggressively walking towards me. Most field stops are complete in minutes. How difficult is it to cooperate for that long?”

If you believe an officer is violating your rights or bullying you, Dutta says, don’t challenge him then — save that for lodging a complaint later. “Do what the officer tells you to and it will end safely for both of you.”

Dutta notes that he doesn’t defend all police, and sides with the ACLU regarding police misconduct. He also makes some popular recommendations, such as cops wearing body cameras.

But some critics are still shaking their heads:

While Dutta comes off as “reasonable,” he is demanding “unresisting submission to police without argument or even legal protest,” J.D. Tuccille writes at “Just how do you ‘refuse consent to search your car or home’ without running afoul of the no-nos Dutta warns may get you ‘shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground?'”

UPDATE: After publication of this article, Colorado Technical University contacted The College Fix to point out that the Washington Post had added an update to the byline of Dutta’s original article:

Sunil Dutta, a professor of homeland security at Colorado Tech University, has been an officer with the Los Angeles Police Department for 17 years. The views presented here are his own and do not represent the LAPD or CTU.

Read the full article here.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Soozarty1/Flickr

Update on this story from two weeks ago: The Arizona State University professor whose videotaped arrest drew national attention and claims of racial profiling has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor violation of resisting arrest.

Reuters reports that English professor Ersula Ore accepted a plea deal in Maricopa County Superior Court in which her aggravated-assault charge was dropped. The county attorney’s spokesman said she’ll probably get probation when she’s sentenced Aug. 1.

Some Ore supporters claimed she was targeted for jaywalking on a street where everyone had to cross to avoid construction, and that she defended herself from the arresting officer’s “grabbing” while her dress was up.

The FBI will continue its civil-rights investigation into the incident, requested by the school, despite Ore’s plea deal, Reuters said.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Internet screenshot

Campus Reform reports on former Vice President Al Gore’s controversial remarks at Princeton University:

Former Vice President Al Gore compared the fight against climate change to the civil rights movement, and called on Princeton graduates to help to do their part at the university’s annual Class Day.

Gore said that American society must agree that there is a problem before it can move to make a change. He recalled a childhood memory in the South about a friend who made a racist remark; his other friends were quick to tell the student to “shut up,” and informed him that such thinking was no longer acceptable.

In the same way, Gore suggested progress can be made for climate change through changing the discussion…

Full story here.

(Image: JDLasica.Flickr)

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled yesterday that teacher tenure laws “deprived students of their right to an education under the State Constitution and violated their civil rights.” The New York Times reports:

“Substantial evidence presented makes it clear to this court that the challenged statutes disproportionately affect poor and/or minority students,” Judge Rolf M. Treu of Los Angeles Superior Court wrote in the ruling. “The evidence is compelling. Indeed, it shocks the conscience.”

The decision, which was enthusiastically endorsed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan, brings a close to the first chapter of the case, Vergara v. California, in which a group of student plaintiffs backed by a Silicon Valley millionaire argued that state tenure laws had deprived them of a decent education by leaving bad teachers in place.

Joshua Pechthalt, president of the California Federation of Teachers, said Treu “fell victim to the anti-union, anti-teacher rhetoric and one of America’s finest corporate law firms that set out to scapegoat teachers for the real problems that exist in public education.”

The state’s teachers’ unions plan an appeal.

Read the full story here.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter



No privatization reform was left behind as prominent education activist Diane Ravitch went on the attack.

“You have a civic obligation to serve the schools. It’s part of the commons. Even if you don’t need it, these are civic responsibilities—not consumer goods.”

So said prominent progressive education reform activist Diane Ravitch at a recent guest lecture at Stanford University, where she also denounced private schools and charter schools as unethical and ineffective. She also called for free preschool and healthcare for all mothers and children, claiming women who don’t have good prenatal care tend to have special-needs children.

Ravitch’s talk Sept. 30, a stop on the tour for her new book, Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to Public Schools, underscored that “society has the obligation to level the playing field” through free public education and any other services necessary to maintain that.

She called for free pre-kindergarten education, free health care for all kids and pregnant mothers, reduced-class sizes, summer programs, a full year of professional education for all teachers, and a richer curriculum (including PE, art, sciences, and music) “not just for advantaged suburban schools.”

“This is the civil rights issue of our time,” she said. “All children have the right to equal education opportunity.”

She suggested that a series of hoaxes maintained by private, profit-driven interests has convinced innocent citizens of a reform system “built on a mountain of error.” She described some of the results of the privatization/voucher movement with visible disgust: closing public schools, laying off librarians and teachers, and turning dollars over to entrepreneurs.

“Schools belong to the community,” Ravitch said. “You can’t just decide to privatize public goods, because they don’t just belong to you; they belong to the whole community. To the future.”

The majority of the talk was driven by what Ravitch considers to be those hoaxes that greedy entrepreneurs have fed to the public about education. The points were highly aggressive and often simplified, straw-man arguments. She went so far as to imply that virtual charter schools steal homeschoolers’ money by tricking them into purchasing their educational products.

“The biggest hoax is the online charter schools,” Ravitch said. “They have really bad test scores, and nearly 50 percent drop out. But the ‘schools’ don’t care, so long as they can recruit more, because enrollment equals profits.”

Ravitch was adamant that education not be privatized.

“Schools are not stocks,” she said. “They’re institutions embedded in the community, sometimes for generations.”

She continued, arguing that merit pay always fails because teachers are already doing the best they know how.

“They aren’t hiding their best lessons,” she joked, suggesting that all public school teachers love their jobs and join the profession for fulfillment while teachers motivated by pay would make no added effort.

Ravitch rigorously defended teachers throughout her lecture. She proffered that teachers are not doing so poorly as their evaluations would suggest, but rather that the evaluation system, which is based on students’ test scores, is broken. Here at least she cited research by the Gates Foundation by which the current system “has been disproven again and again.”

She also argued that the highest performing states—based off of the very metrics she had just bad-mouthed—are the most highly unionized and that this is not a coincidence. Rather, she argued that unions’ protection to teachers from unjust firing creates an atmosphere where educators can experiment and gain longterm experience.

Fix contributor Devon Zuegel is a student at Stanford University.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook / TWITTER: @CollegeFix