Fix Features

illegal immigrants

Some students in the country illegally have complained that the millions of dollars the University of California system recently pledged to help them earn a college degree will come by way of student loans instead of grants.

As UC officials discuss specifics on how the $5 million UC President Janet Napolitano recently budgeted to support undocumented students will be allocated – much of which will go to student loan programs, it’s been decided - some student activists have bemoaned that it’s not fair to strap stressed out, disadvantaged students in the country illegally with college debt.

“We think that the 5 million dollars will have an impact if the money goes directly into the pockets of undocumented students,” By Any Means Necessary campus activist group leader David Douglass told The Daily Californian in an email.

The Californian goes on to report:

Sophomore Ivan Villasenor Madriz, an undocumented student, spoke with representatives from the UC Office of the President and other undocumented student representatives across the UC campuses in a conference call the evening of Dec. 18.

Madriz said the students raised concerns about the use of the funds for loans rather than other types of aid such as grants and work-study. He said loans should not be considered “aid” because they are only increasing student debt and putting more pressure on students.

“The loans that are given out are making one hole to fill another,” he said. “It defeats the purpose of so-called ‘financial aid.’ ”

IMAGE: Chris Gold/Flickr


Reuters reports that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has said he will sign a bill offering in-state tuition to illegal immigrants. who have attended at least three years of high school in the state.

“The most important thing is for these young men and women of our state, who we have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in their K-12 education, we’re now going to give them an opportunity in an affordable way to be able to continue their education,” Christie said.

The Democrat-controlled state legislature has already voted to approve the new law and it awaits the Republican governor’s signature. Christie vetoed a previous version of the bill that would have also allowed some illegal immigrants to qualify for government-funded financial aid.

“This will be once again an example of New Jersey showing how you can come to bipartisan agreement.”

Read more.

{ 1 comment }

The Marietta Daily Journal reports:

DECATUR — A judge said Thursday that he needs more information and time to decide the case of a group of young people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children and want the Georgia university system to grant them in-state tuition.

The roughly three dozen young immigrants have been granted temporary permission to stay in the U.S. under an Obama administration policy introduced last year. They filed a lawsuit in August asking a judge to instruct the university system’s Board of Regents to allow them to qualify for in-state tuition.

Read more.

h/t: Fox News



The UC Berkeley student government has banned the term “illegal immigrant” from its discourse, deeming the phrase racist, offensive, unfair and derogatory.

In an unanimous vote, student senators passed a resolution that stated the word “illegal” is “racially charged,” “dehumanizes” people, and contributes to “punitive and discriminatory actions aimed primarily at immigrants and communities of color.”

The “resolution in support of drop the I-word campaign” was approved 18 to 0 with one abstention on Oct. 30, according to a copy of the meeting’s minutes obtained by The College Fix.

Its approval marks at least the second time this semester that a public university’s student government has voted to eradicate the phrase. UCLA passed a nearly identical measure in late August.

There are an estimated 900 students in the country illegally who are currently enrolled in the 10-campus, University of California system, according to UC officials. These students live in “fear” because former Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano is now president of the UC system, according to the resolution, which aims to “create a safe campus environment for all students.”

“The ‘I’ word is legally inaccurate since being out of status is a civil rather than criminal infraction,” states the resolution, which notes some journalists have stopped using the term.

“No human being is illegal,” the resolution continues. “ ‘Foreign nationals,’ ‘undocumented immigrants,’ ‘immigrants without papers’ and ‘immigrants seeking status’ are examples of terms we can use that do not dehumanize people.”

The resolution also calls for administrators and faculty to attend an “UndocuAlly training workshop.”

Several student senators praised the resolution, the meeting’s minutes state.

Student Sen. Wendy Pacheco said it was not just symbolic, but aimed to shift how people see their “fellow human beings,” that it’s not OK for someone to feel comfortable calling another “illegal,” while student Sen. Sean Tan said discouraging the word will help ease the negative psychological harm undocumented students face by the label.

The lone abstention came from student Sen. Solomon Nwoche.

Nwoche said while he sympathized with the situation, he thinks the resolution does not accomplish anything substantial. He added he was disappointed in how a student who spoke against the resolution at an earlier meeting was treated by student senators, who laughed or had their backs turned when the lone protestor addressed the dais.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook. / TWITTER: @CollegeFix

IMAGE: Chris Gold NY/ Flickr


A man convicted of attempting to abduct a Virginia Tech student was sentenced on Thursday. Arlex Cardenas-Flores, age 34, will be deported after he serves a two year prison sentence.

Authorities discovered that he was in the country illegally.

WWBT News reports that Flores attacked a female student in June of last year and tried to force her into his pickup truck.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook / TWITTER: @CollegeFix


The University of Notre Dame has opened its doors to illegal immigrants

The private Catholic institution has agreed that “changes in its admission policies…will make possible the admission of undocumented students who successfully compete for a place in its first-year and transfer classes,” its officials recently announced.

“In making the decision to admit academically qualified men and women who are undocumented, we will strengthen our incoming class and give deserving young people the chance for a Notre Dame education,” Don Bishop, associate vice president for undergraduate enrollment, stated in a campus news release.

It added Notre Dame is committed to “meeting the full demonstrated financial need for all admitted students.” The total estimated cost for undergrads for the 2013-14 school year, including tuition, room and board, books and supplies, and personal expenses, is $60,117, according to the Notre Dame website.

University spokesman Dennis Brown, in an email to The College Fix, said the decision came about after an ad hoc task force comprised of a dozen faculty members from leading relevant campus units, such as the Center for Social Concerns and the Institute for Educational Initiatives, studied the issue. The committee was launched at the behest of university president Fr. John Jenkins.

“The admission of undocumented students into American colleges and universities has been the subject of discussion in higher education for several years,” Brown said. “Last spring, a small group of Notre Dame faculty and administrators was asked to examine the policies of other Catholic universities, the views of U.S. bishops, federal policy, and this university’s own history. After several months of discussion and reflection, the group recommended the change in policy.”

Brown also noted Notre Dame took into account the public stances on immigration taken by the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“This remains, of course, a contentious issue in our society, and we understand that many will not agree with our new approach,” Brown said. “But, by considering the views of the bishops and our counterparts in Catholic higher education, while also using the new federal policy as a guide, we believe that this is the right thing to do.”

Theology Professor Tim Matovina, executive director of Institute for Latino Studies and one of three co-chairs of the immigration ad hoc task force, said the group’s mission was to formulate a project on immigration that would make a substantive contribution to research and knowledge about immigration in the United States at Notre Dame.

“Notre Dame is part of that universal Catholic mission which, at its core, is to evangelize everyone, from all walks and stripes of life,” Matovina told The Fix. “I’m very supportive of the plan. I think Notre Dame did the right thing.”

Rev. Joseph Corpora, who works with Campus Ministry’s Latino Ministries, also praised the new policy.

“I am absolutely delighted and thrilled that the University has decided to admit qualified undocumented students to live and study here,” he said. “This is an historic moment in the life of Notre Dame. There are all sorts of arguments that one can put forth as to why this is a good decision, but, in the end, all these good arguments are trumped by Matthew 25: 31-46: ‘When I was a stranger, you welcomed me.’” 

Since the press release predated most students’ return to campus, the topic hasn’t been broadly discussed by the student body.

Senior Conor Dorgan, an international economics and Spanish major who has studied abroad in three South American countries during his time at Notre Dame, said he had no problem with the new policy.

“The decision to admit undocumented students is consistent with the University’s Catholic character and, in light of the Church’s social teaching on immigration issues, should be less controversial than the larger national debate on federal policy,” Dorgan said.

The question of how Notre Dame’s new policy would interact with federal regulations was the subject of speculation by another student.

Pier Pigozzi, a JSD student originally from Ecuador, said that he wasn’t sure how the policy would fare in implementation.

“It’s a very generous policy,” he said. “I took it as a being very coherent with the Catholic tradition of the university.”

“In practical terms I don’t know how it all will work,” he added. “How this policy will impact the legal immigrants, like myself, who are here, I don’t know. It would be interesting to know the reaction of the police or immigration authorities. It will require a lot of effort in the logistics on Notre Dame’s part to make this happen in a positive way, not just in an abstract act of charity.”

Others shared in Pigozzi’s caution.

Gerard Bradley, professor of law, observed that “the university official in charge of admissions says that admitting persons living illegally in the country will ‘strengthen’ the student body.  It might.”

“But,” he went on, “it is much more important to consider how the relevant moral norms of justice and fairness come to bear on the question of admitting undocumented students and also the further question of providing them financial aid beyond that available to persons here lawfully (because various government student aid programs would be unavailable to the undocumented).”

Brown also addressed the question of financial aid for undocumented students, who would be ineligible by federal law to receive federal funding, such as Pell Grants.

“With any student requiring assistance, undocumented or not, we meet the full demonstrated financial need,” Brown explained. “Since most of our aid packages also include a federal Pell Grant and federal work study, both of which would be unavailable to an undocumented student, the university would make up the difference, which is about $8,200 annually.”

Another professor commented anonymously in an e-mail to The Fix that he has “reason to believe that some benefactors of the university are willing to donate additional resources to Notre Dame to cover whatever additional financial aid costs this policy might entail.”

He added that “given the admissions standards of Notre Dame, one has to assume that we are talking about an extremely small number of [undocumented] students, maybe none in any given year.”

CLICK HERE to read the full statement from Brown on the university’s decision.

Fix contributor Michael Bradley is a student at the University of Notre Dame.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook  /  Twitter: @CollegeFix

IMAGE: NDomer73/Flickr

{ 1 comment }