Newtown Conneticut

TUCSON, ARIZ.- In the spring of 2013, the University of Arizona came to a standstill after university police were notified a man armed with a rifle was reportedly on the loose in the administration building.

Officers surrounded the building, evacuated neighboring facilities and shut down nearby streets. They conducted a room-by-room search to find the shooter, but found no evidence of a shooting, perpetrator or gun-related injuries.

Although that incident was a false alarm, officers used response tactics they developed following a shooting on campus in 2002, when a disgruntled student shot and killed three professors at the nursing college before fatally turning the gun on himself.

The surge of shootings and gun-related crimes on college campuses in the past few decades have prompted campus safety officials to revise their active-shooter response plans.

But Friday night’s shootings in a town adjacent to the UC Santa Barbara campus shows how active-shooter plans may need to encompass nearby areas. A 22-year-old gunman allegedly killed seven people, himself included, in a string of shootings and stabbings.

At the time of the 2002 shooting, the standard response to active-shooter situations was for law enforcement officials to “wait for  SWAT to show up,” or “surround the building, make sure we had plenty of resources before we go in and take care of the problem,” according to Officer George Eppley of the University of Arizona Police Department, in an interview with The College Fix.

Combined with other firearm-related crimes on college campuses, “the whole philosophy changed,” said Eppley, prompting university law enforcement officials to go back to the drawing board for their active-shooter response tactics.

Now, officers responding to the scene of an active-shooter situation immediately enter the building armed with rifles and the intent to locate and “eliminate” the suspect, Eppley said, meaning shoot to kill.

University law enforcement officials now undergo live-action active-shooter training at least on an annual basis, according to Eppley.

Training involves a simulated situation with a suspect, rifles that shoot paintball rounds and victims sprawled across the floor covered in fake blood with the end goal to go “in and eliminate the bad guy,” Eppley said.

Eppley feels the training effectively prepares officers to respond to the scene of an active-shooter situation, even though it’s just a training exercise.

“When you get there you know it’s all role playing, but when you see people laying on the ground and there’s some type of red food coloring that is on them,” he said, “it looks like the real thing.”

Many other institutions of higher education have begun to revise their response plans in the wake of the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, according to Robin Hattersley-Gray, executive editor of Campus Safety magazine.

An effective emergency response plan for active-shooter situations is crucial for the safety and security of college campuses, Hattersley-Gray said.

This year’s edition of the magazine’s annual safety report, The Campus Safety Yearbook, reveals that although 72 percent of campus safety officials are required to undergo some sort of active-shooter training, the current degree of preparation for active-shooter responses is far from ideal.

Only 21 percent of officials strongly agreed that their public safety department had enough, and the appropriate type, of lethal and “less-lethal” weapons to adequately respond to a weapons-related incident.

Less than a third of campus law enforcement and security officials carry lethal weapons on average, according to the study. Only 13 percent of officials carry non-lethal weapons.

Further, only 28 percent of officials felt that campus police officers or other persons responsible for campus security had received suitable training on handling lethal weapons.

However, the greatest challenge that lies ahead in increasing the effectiveness of response tactics is raising awareness and preparedness for active-shooter situations among non-security individuals on campus, said Hattersley-Gray.

Students and faculty should know what a gunshot sounds like, how to alert safety officials to a possible active-shooter situation, points of evacuation for an area and where to seek shelter if evacuation is impossible, according to Hattersley-Gray.

College Fix contributor Julianne Stanford is a student at the University of Arizona.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Maximillian Curry/Flickr

Ryan Cortes, a student at Florida Atlantic University and editor with its campus magazine, wrote a column Wednesday that came to the defense of professor James Tracy, who made headlines this week after claiming the Newtown, Conn., school massacre either didn’t take place or was part of some sort of government conspiracy.

In a column titled “reaction to FAU professor’s Newtown conspiracy is misguided and misinformed,” Cortes writes in the University Press student magazine that: “I’ve taken three of Tracy’s classes in my time at FAU, including one called Culture of Conspiracy. Hell, I’ve seen more 9/11 documentaries than Tarantino flicks, and damn do I love those. But I also love people who think differently and cause you to see perspectives you wouldn’t ponder.”

Cortes goes on to state:

… This is someone who has changed my opinion many times before. His theories usually center around a failed national media that didn’t dig deep and ask more questions. It led him to believe Osama bin Laden’s alleged killing was a conspiracy, that the Oklahoma City Bombings were another, and that 9/11 had so many unanswered questions that if you weren’t asking on your own, well, you never were going to ask about anything anyway.

So I come into this discussion having spent a good deal of time with the man. I know how he thinks and I know when he starts asking questions, this many questions, he’s informed on the subject and he’ll cause me to at least think twice. I didn’t agree with everything he wrote, but I knew what was coming Tracy’s way. Vitriol. Hate. Anger.

All of it.

But none of these people knew the real Tracy. It was a blog post turned into a headline turned into a tweet turned into thousands of angry readers, but it didn’t tell the whole story. I remembered classmates of mine while taking Tracy’s classes who would stand outside during breaks, mesmerized, over what the professor’s opinions forced you think long and hard about before believing.

The column also quotes the school’s faculty union president:

 “The reaction is weird,” said (Chris Robé, FAU’s faculty union president). “I mean, part of it I get. This isn’t being sensitive to the victims, and I get that, it’s OK. But there was one person commenting that said they believe in free speech but they don’t want their tax payer dollars to go to this. Well then, you don’t really believe in free speech, right?”

“The point is, the guy has the right to say what he’s saying. When people start saying he’s crazy or demand that he gets fired because they’re offended by something he says, well, shit, all of us could be fired for something offensive we’ve said.”

Cortes ends his column by saying of Tracy: “At least he was thinking something.”

Click here to read the entire article.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.