racism

At Northwestern University over the weekend, a few students tried to organize a party with a “Spirit Animals” theme: “Come celebrate spring quarter with NBN this Saturday at our annual spring party! Theme: Spirit Animals. Everyone has a kindred spirit animal , so come sport your cat ears, wings, and unicorn horns with us.”

But, wouldn’t you know it, someone got offended.

Someone posted a complaint on the group’s Facebook page:

“Ack, please don’t make this the theme. It’s culturally appropriative and could cause some trouble.”

Immediately, the group caved and cancelled the “spirit animal” theme. That’s the kind of almighty instantaneous power that the ultra-PC crowd holds on college campuses.

And just in case you’re wondering what “culturally appropriative” means in the first place–it means, basically, that it’s not politically correct for white kids to “appropriate” the images, ideas, words, or themes of a favored minority group–in this case, presumably, Native Americans. Not even for an innocent and celebratory purpose.

That’s what happens when political correctness takes hold.

Our campuses today are overrun by PC-police who tell others what the can and cannot say, do, or think. “Cultural sensitivity” becomes a big bludgeon to squash the free speech rights of others, and to turn innocent, insignificant ideas into thought crimes.

Nathan Harden is editor of The College Fix and author of SEX & GOD AT YALE: Porn, Political Correctness, and a Good Education Gone Bad.

Follow Nathan on Facebook /  Twitter:@NathanHarden

{ 1 comment }

President Barack Obama frequently sounded like Ronald Reagan during a commencement speech at Morehouse College on Sunday, calling for better family values among the black community and personal responsibility over complaints about racism.

Morehouse College is a historically black, all-male university in Georgia, where the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. also attended.

During his speech to the Class of 2013, Obama promoted the ideals of persistence and hard work, and told graduates not to play the blame game when things don’t go their way, not to think everything is just about ”trying to keep a black man down.”

“Barriers have come tumbling down, new doors of opportunity have swung open; laws, hearts, and minds have been changed to the point where someone who looks like you can serve as President of the United States,” Obama said.

He also told them that, while times were tough for black men decades ago – and racism still exists today - it’s time to step up to the plate and take care of business. To let go of the past and take charge of the future. Don’t rely on hand outs. Don’t blame racism.

“There’s no longer any room for excuses,” Obama said. “… In today’s hyperconnected, hypercompetitive world, with a billion young people from China and India and Brazil entering the global workforce alongside you, nobody is going to give you anything you haven’t earned. And whatever hardships you may experience because of your race, they pale in comparison to the hardships previous generations endured – and overcame.”

He delved into family values, and told the young men to stand by their future wives and children as husbands, fathers and role models. He mentioned church, hard work and perseverance.

“I was raised by a heroic single mother and wonderful grandparents who made incredible sacrifices for me,” he said. “And I know there are moms and grandparents here today who did the same thing for all of you. But I still wish I had a father who was not only present, but involved. And so my whole life, I’ve tried to be for Michelle and my girls what my father wasn’t for my mother and me. I’ve tried to be a better husband, a better father, and a better man.”

“It’s hard work that demands your constant attention, and frequent sacrifice. And Michelle will be the first to tell you that I’m not perfect. Even now, I’m still learning how to be the best husband and father I can be. Because success in everything else is unfulfilling if we fail at family.”

Despite the promising and personal speech, there were still themes expected from Obama. At one point he mentioned the notion that “as an African-American, you have to work twice as hard as anyone else if you want to get by.”

But he followed that up with citing the American Dream: “But if you stay hungry, keep hustling, keep on your grind and get other folks to do the same – nobody can stop you.”

True to form, Obama also cited perceived discriminations.

“Many of you know what it’s like to be an outsider; to be marginalized; to feel the sting of discrimination,” he said, and went on to list ”Hispanic Americans,” “Gay and lesbian Americans,” “Muslim Americans” and “women.”

But he didn’t follow it up with whining.

“Recognize the burdens you carry with you, but resist the temptation to use them as excuses,” he said. “Transform the way we think about manhood … set higher standards for yourselves and others.”

“That’s what being an American is about. Success may not come quickly or easily. But if you strive to do what’s right; if you work harder and dream bigger; if you set an example in your own lives and do your part to help meet the challenges of our time, then I am confident that, together, we will continue the never-ending task of perfecting our union.”

“Congratulations, class of 2013. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.”

Amen to that.

Jennifer Kabbany is associate editor of The College Fix.

CLICK HERE for a full transcript of Obama’s Morehouse College speech.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

IMAGE: YouTube Screenshot

{ 0 comments }

This week when a group of liberal anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-capitalism students raised a ruckus at Dartmouth College, the mighty Ivy League institution caved like a house of cards and cancelled classes.

Former assistant editor for The College Fix, Robby Soave, reports for The Daily Caller:

Dartmouth College cancelled classes on Wednesday in order to hold a public forum addressing some students’ concerns that the esteemed member of the Ivy League supports social ills such as sexism, racism and capitalism.

The aggrieved students are part of a group called Real Talk Dartmouth that crashed a college recruiting event last week to protest what they believe is a toxic climate on campus. Dartmouth responded by giving in to the group’s demands. School officials canceled classes on Wednesday and encouraging students to attend a series of community building sessions.

In a promotional video, members of Real Talk held signs bearing messages that accuse the university of actively supporting evil causes.

“Dartmouth supports violence against queer students,” asserted one sign.

“Dartmouth supports sexism,” charged another.

“Dartmouth supports capitalism,” declared another.

The students did little to explain their complaint against capitalism, or what is wrong with supporting it, particularly when undergraduate tuition, room, board and fees at the august institution are just under $58,000 per year. The school’s endowment is about $3.5 billion.

Student protesters also did not list what actions the college had taken to support sexism or anti-gay violence…

Read the full story here.

Apparently, all this grievance was prompted by a few offensive comments posted on a non-university affiliated website, calling sexual assault protestor on campus “terrorists” and threatening to “execute” them. But there’s no indication that the police or anyone else took these as serious threats, or anything more than another couple of kids talking trash on the internet. Yet these words were enough to prompt the violent backlash of the campus’ self-styled radical left-wing contingent. Dartmouth liberals are fighting violent words with violent actions, I guess you could say.

To clarify, what happened next is this: The protested protestors organized a protest. Got that?

Well, never mind if it’s confusing. And never mind if the claims of these “protestors” have any basis in reality. Elite liberal academics are so terrified of being labeled “insensitive” to the ills of racism, or sexism, or any other “ism” that they will do anything to appease the liberal activists on campus.

Furthermore, these so-called “protestors” disrupted other students, interrupted classes, and even allegedly assaulted other students. Yet, the administration has rewarded these interlopers by treating their claims as if they were serious and by giving no indication that they plan to hold them accountable for their illegal and arrogant behavior.

Nicholas S. Duva & J.P. Harrington of the Dartmouth Review explain further:

When an illegal, disruptive and widely unpopular protest leads to the administration cancelling classes for the first time since 1986, it sends the message that violence is a justifiable means of instigating discussion. If halting classes truly makes students safer or ceases the harassment, then that’s good, but it cannot change the morality or legality of the protest. The administration ought to pursue justice and the rule of law by punishing those who committed or threatened violence in the past week, no matter their viewpoint…

Reality Check
If you were to search the entire country, it would be very hard to find many environments that are more thoroughly riddled with political correctness than an Ivy League university. So why, therefore, would anyone lend credence to the idea that such a place was a hot-bed of racism? (Unless one were referring to reverse discrimination against Asian applicants for example–something we can be assured that these left-wing protestors have NO problem with. Or else discrimination against conservatives when it comes to hiring faculty–another thing I’m sure they have no complaints about.)

What I wonder is this: if these students are so outraged and aggrieved, and feel so victimized, even while they reside in the liberal bubble of an elite university, then how are they ever going to cope with the realities of the real world? You see, unlike an Ivy League university, the real world won’t shut itself down in order to host a series of “community building sessions” every time a group complains about the racism, sexism, etc. that they perceive all around them. And shame on the Dartmouth administration for kowtowing to them.

To all those young Dartmouth liberals who fancy themselves warriors for left-wing causes: There’s such a thing as crying wolf, you know.

But this is what I want to know: Are Dartmouth officials going to reimburse all the rest of Dartmouth’s students whose classes were cancelled for no good reason?

Nathan Harden is editor of The College Fix and author of the book SEX & GOD AT YALE: Porn, political correctness, and a good education gone bad (St. Martins, 2012)

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

Twitter: @CollegeFix

(Image by IMPAawards / WMC)

{ 0 comments }

For nearly 100 years, members of the men’s social group The Tejas Club at the University of Texas have called each other “braves” as a show of kinship and to pay homage to East Texas Indians, but one professor recently told club members they’re racist because of the practice.

Professor Robert Jensen, who caused controversy last November when he called Thanksgiving a “white supremacist” observance and likened the Founding Fathers to Nazi Germany, told members of the men’s student club at one of their weekly coffee klatches that calling each other “braves” in effect celebrates what Jensen called the genocide of Native Americans.

“(It’s) inappropriate, and in fact is racist,” Jensen said Monday in an interview with The College Fix. “The United States as a nation exists as a result of one of the most, if not thee most, extensive genocidal campaigns in recorded human history. The European conquest of what is now the continental United States resulted in the extermination of virtually all indigenous people in the United States.”

Jensen said he believes the tradition should change, that the club’s members are acting racist, whether they think they are or not.

“A lot of us who are white are unconsciously racist throughout our lives in all sorts of ways,” he said. “We are not always aware of what we are doing.”

Jensen, 54, is a journalism professor who has taught at the university for 21 years.

Jensen’s comments to Tejas Club members were made on March 21 as an invited guest speaker for one of the group’s weekly coffee meetings, which aim to facilitate conversations and intelligent debate among students on a variety of topics. Often, high-profile guests are invited to speak.

Each year, The Tejas Club co-hosts a “Week of Women” coffee with the Orange Jackets, a women’s service organization at the University of Texas, and it was at that annual event that Jensen made his controversial remarks.

He was asked to speak primarily on pornography’s connection to sexism and racism, which he did. But toward the end of the talk a female student in the audience asked Jensen what he thought about The Tejas Club’s practice of calling each other “braves.”

The way a Tejas Club member describes it, it was then that Jensen went “on a ten-minute tirade regarding the persecution of Native Americans,” states an email to The College Fix from the club’s president, Chris Fellows.

“He concluded with ‘your organization is racist’ and promptly ended his talk, rejecting all questions and opportunities for dialogue,” Fellows stated. “Members of Tejas approached Mr. Jensen to discuss his accusation, but he found all points to be ‘bullshit.’ After it became clear that rising tempers made civil discourse impossible, Mr. Jensen was politely asked to leave three times. The Tejas Club’s reaction wasn’t a response to Mr. Jensen’s views on sexism or racism, but on his combative and aggressive approach.”

“We’re disappointed that the outcome of this event wasn’t a conversation about women’s issues, as it should have been. And we certainly don’t think solutions to racism or sexism have been achieved, but we will continue to host coffees regarding these topics until they are.”

Jensen said he was just doing what he thought was right.

“Whether it was a tirade or not is subjective, they are welcome to their interpretation,” he said. “I told them I thought it was important for white people to hold each other accountable for racist practices.”

The Tejas Club, however, works to promote a variety of causes that support diversity and equality. Founded in 1925, members today participate in pro-diversity events on campus, and host the weekly coffee meetings, open to the entire university community.

“In December, it hosts a holiday party for underprivileged children,” the group’s website states. “Throughout the year, the Braves participate in community service projects. … Recently, the club has partnered with the University’s Counseling and Mental Health Center to further suicide prevention and awareness with our fellow students.”

As for the history of the “braves” moniker, the club’s website states: “Friendship is the most important attribute of a Tejas Brave. In fact, Tejas is derived from the Native American word for ‘friend’ or ‘ally.’ … (Original members) began to call themselves the Tejas and referred to each other as braves, with the intention of emulating the friendliness of the East Texas Indians.”

While Fellows declined to comment to The College Fix specifically about Jensen’s racism accusations, Jensen said he recalls some of the young men on March 21 arguing that the “braves” nickname honors Native Americans. But Jensen said that explanation does not cut it.

“I do remember some of the men saying they feel they are honoring Indian people with this practice, and that is a standard response for people who use Indian nicknames and mascots,” he said. “I don’t think there is a strong argument there. … I think it’s important for the United States to come to terms with its history. … This is a culture that is in deep denial about its own barbarianism.”

Jennifer Kabbany is associate editor of The College Fix.

CLICK HERE to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

IMAGE: Shown is Professor Robert Jensen/Credit – Jason Cato

{ 5 comments }

Last week The College Fix reported on an alleged sighting of a “KKK Figure” at Oberlin College, which caused the college to cancel all classes. Police later reported that the “KKK figure” may have in fact simply been a person wrapped in a blanket.

Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin writes about how colleges need to show more restraint when responding to alleged campus “hate crimes.”

American college campuses are the most fertile grounds for fake hate. They’re marinated in identity politics and packed with self-indulgent, tenured radicals suspended in the 1960s. In the name of enlightenment and tolerance, these institutions of higher learning breed a corrosive culture of left-wing self-victimization. Take my alma mater, Oberlin College. Please.

This week, the famously “progressive” college in Ohio made international headlines when it shut down classes after a series of purported hate crimes.

Read more at Fox Nation.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

{ 0 comments }

A recent “Tunnel of Oppression” student exhibit at CU Boulder that aimed to highlight insulting and derogatory words and images included among its offerings a picture of an angry-looking Bill O’Reilly, implying the Fox News anchor is a perpetrator of such demagoguery.

The photo of the newsman included the words “lynching party against Michelle Obama” in bold, large white letters. The photo also indicates it was taken from a video on FoxAttacks.com, a website with a tagline, “they distort, we reply.”

The video in question highlights what some perceived to be hostile reporting toward Michelle Obama on Fox News leading up to the 2008 election, although ironically the audio clip of O’Reilly it includes has the newsman saying: “and I don’t want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama.”

The video then cuts to a definition of lynching, noting “after the Civil War, southern whites used lynching to terrorize and intimidate freed blacks who were voting and assuming political power.”

But it appears O’Reilly – one of the most public faces of Fox News – is an oppressor, at least according to the exhibit, which was showcased last week on campus.

An estimated 1,000 people toured the three-day event, put on by a student diversity program centered at a LGBTQ-friendly dorm within the university and the ISM group, or Injustice Stops with Me.

Its goal, organizers said, is to raise awareness and take a stand against hate.

The O’Reilly photo was among hundreds of other offerings hung along the tunnel that organizers said showed examples of homophobia, ableism, ageism, transphobia, religious oppression, racism, body image, xenophobia, sexism, racism and bias.

Organizers encourage professors to send students to the annual exhibit, now in its eighth year, which has cut outs of supposedly offensive pictures and advertisements found in magazines and on websites. It also has slang words and the definitions of all the “isms” it aims to fight pinned along black curtains strung together to create a long tunnel for visitors to walk through.

As guests took in the passage last week, organizers doled out sunglasses with the words “See Life Through a Different Lens.” The students who meandered through the tunnel remained mostly silent and solemn.

A “speak-up section” at the end of the tour advised students on how they can join the fight against oppression.

CU Boulder sophomore Gianni Franceschi, 20, said in an interview with The College Fix that tunnel told the true story of how racism and other phobias are inherent within society.

“There are many advertisements out there about oppression and racism, and a lot of those advertisements were making racism look like it was a joke and not a serious matter,” she said.

Junior Anastasia Davis, 21, told The Fix the displays were powerful and moving.

“I almost cried,” Davis said. “Especially seeing the writing in the bathrooms in (the campus library).”

Other students, however, were less impressed with the display and thought the images hurt the goal of the tunnel to combat oppression.

Freshman Will O’Bryan, 18, said that the tunnel offered many run of the mill photos and advertisements, yet the examples were construed as racist and homophobic by hypersensitive exhibit organizers who see hate where there is none.

“The issues they are presenting are noncontroversial, but it’s clear they are looking at it from a left-wing agenda,” O’Bryan said.

O’Bryan added the tunnel’s pictures of comments in the library’s bathroom stalls were laughable.

“It’s a ballroom wall,” he said. “What are you expecting to find there?”

Fix contributor Aslinn Scott is a student at CU Boulder.

{ 9 comments }