‘Parenting styles of recent decades far too enthusiastic about instilling self-esteem,’ social scientist says

As the calendar flips to a new year, the world turns a little grayer. Another year of college graduates prepares to face the harsh realities of the workplace, slowly but surely remaking the labor force in the image of the millennial.

Much has been documented about how millennials differ from previous generations by having grown up in an era of instantaneous communication and perpetual media exposure.

But are employers responding to these differences?

According to the latest Duke/CFO Magazine Global Business Outlook Survey, not quite.

The survey of chief financial officers found that nearly 60 percent in the United States say their firms are not adapting to attract potential millennial employees, defined in the survey as those under 35.

Companies consider millennials a mixed proposition because while they “offer technological and creative advantages, they tend to be less loyal to the company and require more management oversight,” according to the survey’s press release.

More than half the surveyed CFOs think millennials are more interested in their own career and personal development and less loyal to the company. Slightly fewer (46 percent) say that younger workers seem to be more entitled than older peers, and 31 percent believe that they require closer supervision.

Social scientist Charles Murray told The College Fix the survey’s characterization of millennials is similar to other reactions he has heard about.

The author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Getting Ahead, a new advice book directed toward young people entering the workforce, Murray developed his reputation by publishing The Bell Curve, a controversial exploration of intelligence in economic and social success.

Though Murray is confident that companies will ultimately be able to sift through millennial applicants to find the standouts, those who lack grit will fail as entrepreneurs or productive workers, he said.

“The parenting styles of recent decades have been far too enthusiastic about instilling self-esteem and, in the process, have produced far too many fragile flowers,” Murray told The Fix. This could contribute to the sense of entitlement and me-first development that CFOs say they perceive in younger workers.

The rest of the world seems to be accommodating millennials more than the United States, the CFO survey found.

Just 41 percent of U.S. companies “have made changes to adapt to younger workers,” while firms in Latin America and Asia have shown much more willingness to make an effort to hire and retain millennial workers.

CFOs acknowledge that hiring millennials brings advantages including technological savviness, greater creativity and lower cost. The most common adaptations by U.S. companies include more flexible work hours, increased training, allowing work from home, implementing mentor programs and changing corporate culture.

At the same time, if the negative attributes that U.S. CFOs perceive in millennials are accurate, modern American society may have to question the way its institutions are raising children, as Murray says.

College Fix reporter Curtis Chou is a student at Northwestern University.

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: wstera2/Flickr

An entertaining and informative article has been making the rounds on the internet this week, proposing to explain why so many privileged young people these days feel dissatisfied. Does the description below ring true?

The funny thing about the world is that it turns out to not be that easy of a place, and the weird thing about careers is that they’re actually quite hard.  Great careers take years of blood, sweat and tears to build—even the ones with no flowers or unicorns on them—and even the most successful people are rarely doing anything that great in their early or mid-20s.

 But GYPSYs aren’t about to just accept that.
Paul Harvey, a University of New Hampshire professor and GYPSY expert, has researched this, finding that Gen Y has “unrealistic expectations and a strong resistance toward accepting negative feedback,” and “an inflated view of oneself.”  He says that “a great source of frustration for people with a strong sense of entitlement is unmet expectations. They often feel entitled to a level of respect and rewards that aren’t in line with their actual ability and effort levels, and so they might not get the level of respect and rewards they are expecting.”

For those hiring members of Gen Y, Harvey suggests asking the interview question, “Do you feel you are generally superior to your coworkers/classmates/etc., and if so, why?”  He says that “if the candidate answers yes to the first part but struggles with the ‘why,’ there may be an entitlement issue. This is because entitlement perceptions are often based on an unfounded sense of superiority and deservingness. They’ve been led to believe, perhaps through overzealous self-esteem building exercises in their youth, that they are somehow special but often lack any real justification for this belief.”

Read the full article here.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook  /  Twitter: @CollegeFix

(Image: KaraAllyson.Flickr)

Thomas Lindsay wrote in the Austin-American Statesman recently about how grade inflation has exploded over the last fifty years. Shortly thereafter, the Statesman then published a fact-check blog post about his op-ed stating that, yes, grade inflation is every bit as bad as Lindsay claimed:

More than 4 in 10 college grades are A’s and that’s way up from 50 years ago, Thomas K. Lindsay of the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation recently wrote.

In a Jan. 12, 2013, opinion column in the Austin American-Statesman, Lindsay prefaced his claim by saying students study less than they once did.

“Worse, grades during this period have, paradoxically, increased. Approximately 43 percent of all college grades today are A’s, an increase of 28 percentage points since 1960,” Lindsay said.

Could this be the result of  a philosophy of education that emphasizes self-esteem over discipline and achievement?

Read more here.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

A decades-long psychological survey has found that American students have more self-confidence and self-esteem than ever. Meanwhile other surveys show that students know less, and spend less time studying than they did forty years ago.

According to BBC News:

About nine million young people have filled out the American Freshman Survey, since it began in 1966.

It asks students to rate how they measure up to their peers in a number of basic skills areas – and over the past four decades, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of students who describe themselves as being “above average” for academic ability, drive to achieve, mathematical ability and self-confidence.

This was revealed in a new analysis of the survey data, by US psychologist Jean Twenge and colleagues.

Self-appraisals of traits that are less individualistic – such as co-operativeness, understanding others and spirituality – saw little change, or a decrease, over the same period.

Twenge adds that while the Freshman Survey shows that students are increasingly likely to label themselves as gifted in writing ability, objective test scores indicate that actual writing ability has gone down since the 1960s.

And while in the late 1980s, almost half of students said they studied for six or more hours a week, the figure was little over a third by 2009 – a fact that sits rather oddly, given there has been a rise in students’ self-proclaimed drive to succeed during the same period.

Another study by Twenge suggested there has been a 30% tilt towards narcissistic attitudes in US students since 1979…

“Our culture used to encourage modesty and humility and not bragging about yourself,” says Twenge. “It was considered a bad thing to be seen as conceited or full of yourself.”

This generation was raised to value self-esteem above discipline and achievement. Consequently, students are feeling better than ever about themselves while performing worse. We have become a nation of narcissists.

Read the full report here.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

Animation Source: Jochan Gros / Wikimedia Commons

Janice Fiamengo makes her case at PJ Media:

The unteachable student has been told all her life that she is excellent: gifted, creative, insightful, thoughtful, able to succeed at whatever she tries, full of potential and innate ability. Pedagogical wisdom since at least the time of John Dewey — and in some form all the way back to William Wordsworth’s divinely anointed child “trailing clouds of glory” — has stressed the development of self-esteem and a sense of achievement. Education, as Dewey made clear in such works as The Child and the Curriculum (1902), was not about transferring a cultural inheritance from one generation to the next; it was about students’ self-realization. It involved liberating pupils from that stuffy, often stifling, inheritance into free and unforced learning aided by sympathy and encouragement. The teacher was not so much to teach or judge as to elicit a response, leading the student to discover for herself what she, in a sense, already knew. In the past twenty years, the well-documented phenomenon of grade inflation in humanities subjects — the awarding of high “Bs” and “As” to the vast majority of students — has increased the conviction that everyone is first-rate.

Read the rest of the article here.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

The aim is to protect the feelings of others who have been rejected. This from Christine Rousselle of the College Conservative.

Recently, some schools in New York have banned students from discussing their college acceptances, particularly if they were admitted into Ivy League or top-tier schools. The rationale behind this was to protect the feelings of people who were denied acceptance to prestigious universities. At the Calhoun School,

 “seniors have a weekly class with the college guidance counselor, in which they discuss “the appropriate way to share news of acceptance,” said Sarah Tarrant, director of college counseling. “The weekly conversation reins in kids who might run around yelling, ‘I got in! I got in!’ ”

And to that I say: give me a freaking break.

Did I get into every school I applied to? No! Did I weep for several hours upon denial from one of my top choice schools? You bet I did! Did some of my friends get in when I didn’t? Yes! That’s life.

Not everyone is going to get into every school they apply to. They’re not going to get every job they apply for either after school. The fact that schools like Horace Mann, Packer Collegiate Institute, and the Bronx High School of Science all have policies concerning when students can reveal what college they’re going to (or, in the case of Horace Mann, what sweatshirts they can wear) is incredibly disturbing. These are some of the top high school students in the country, and the students who are doing the best, working the hardest, and gaining acceptance into Ivy League schools are essentially being told that their achievements aren’t worth sharing due to the potential bruised egos of their classmates.

What happened to celebrating achievement?

Read the rest of the article.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.