Scholar: Feminism distorted, derailed by conservatives

by Jessica Kubusch - UNC Chapel Hill on September 28, 2012

Feminism has been dealt a huge setback because of iconic conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh and Phyllis Schlafly, who use the crusade’s more radical ideas to create unflattering caricatures of feminists, notions then perpetuated by the mainstream media, a North Carolina history professor says.

This misrepresentation has distorted feminism’s accomplishments and goals, so that today many young women don’t relate to the extreme stereotypes promulgated by conservatives and ultimately reject the movement, said North Carolina feminist and scholar Rachel Seidman.

Seidman, a visiting lecturer at Duke University and adjunct assistant professor at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, is the professor behind the “Who Needs Feminism?” campaign.  Launched in the spring as part of a Duke women’s studies assignment, it turned into a global social networking and Internet phenomenon, with more than 200,000 visits to the project’s Tumblr blog.

Seidman made the comments about conservatives’ influence on feminism at a recent forum at Duke, as well as in a subsequent interview with The College Fix.

At the Sept. 20 forum, called “Who Needs Feminism? Reflecting and Continuing,” Seidman and the students who co-founded the campaign bemoaned feminism’s current public relations problems before discussing ways to reignite and expand their campaign.

Today there’s a “profound misunderstanding of what (feminism) was in the first place,” said Seidman, who laid blame for that on “conservatives who caricature and erase history.”

Seidman’s comments were followed with a presentation by student Ivanna Gonzales, co-founder of the campaign, who attributed the following quote to conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh: “Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.”

Gonzales also attributed evangelist Pat Robertson as saying feminism “encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

She then took aim at Phyllis Schlafly, attributing a quote to the prominent conservative activist that “feminist is a bad word and everything they stand for is bad. Find out if your girlfriend is a feminist before you get too far into it. Some of them are pretty. They don’t all look like Bella Abzug.”

With the three quotes looming large on a screen behind her, Gonzales told the two dozen people in the audience she agreed with Seidman that “lots of negative stereotypes are perpetuated by conservative people in the media.”

If more women would simply educate themselves on real feminism – instead of buying into what conservative leaders say – they’d agree and identify with and support the modern feminist movement instead of reject it, several women leading the presentation indicated.

Seidman expanded on that point in an email to The College Fix.

“Those who felt threatened by the movement have drawn caricatures based on some of the more radical ideas and writings out there, and created a stereotype based on that, which became very popular in the press,” Seidman stated. “So today, young women carry around that stereotype in their head, rather than images of all the various types of real women who were active in the feminist movement, and if they don’t identify with that stereotyped version of radical feminism, then they think they must not ‘be a feminist.’”

“Who Needs Feminism?” spawned from a class Seidman taught at Duke in the spring called “Women in the Public Sphere.” It focused on women’s activism across the United States, and students were encouraged to develop a project with the intent of promoting social change.

Student Ashley Tsai, co-founder of the campaign, said at the forum that at Duke, many of her peers believe feminism is no longer relevant. To show why it is “relevant to people’s lives – not just in academics,” their project asked students to take pictures of themselves holding a dry erase board stating “I need feminism because,” then the reason why.

Initially the photographs were turned into posters and placed on campus, however the project founders said they wanted to include a social networking element and established a Tumblr page. The campaign grew to include a Facebook page and website. The Tumblr page features about 3,000 photographs submitted by individuals and groups from around the world.

There has been a backlash, however. A You Don’t Need Feminism Tumblr blog was started. Other feedback included negative or obscene comments posted online that poke fun of the original message.

Undeterred, the project’s co-founders are updating their website, and adding more resources to it. They provide a Start Your Own Campaign guide to those who ask. And the women are currently working with schools across North Carolina to promote a “Week of Action” in mid-October, during which students will be encouraged to add to the campaign and to discuss feminism.

Fix contributor Jessica Kubusch is a student at UNC Chapel Hill.

IMAGE: The Heritage Foundation

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

  • inathens

    The exact process they complain about, they also employ to make their case: reliance on the most extreme anecdotes to make an oversimplified case about a big complex picture. In so doing they too misrepresent. And they miss the truth that such trends and movements in society are much more complex and intricate and moved by more clear judgment than they suspect. In fact, this happens regularly on all sides. Christians, environmentalists, the tea party… the media picks the extreme stories and personalities to make their stories because people like shocking, attention-grabbing news.

  • http://www.facebook.com/johnj.trainor.7 John J Trainor

    Psychotic! Seidman’s drivel is indicative of the need to fulfill one’s self with a cause. Carrie nation I understand, the early woman’s sufferage movement as well, but today we are dealing with empty personalities, missing Selves in search of a crusade.

  • Jaynie59

    It’s really very funny to read a straight article about feminism that treats Phyllis Schlafly as a target. “She then took aim at Phyllis Schlafly”. That’s the problem with feminists and the feminist movement. It’s not about women at all, it’s about liberalism. Phyllis Schlafly is one of the most accomplished women in America and anyone who doesn’t appreciate that is not only not for women’s rights, they are uneducated no matter how many “womens studies” courses they sit through as they contemplate their vaginas.

    • Smackerel

      The psychotic incoherence of radical feminism has always been one of its most prominent features. In addition to their hatred of Phyllis Schlafly despite her tremendous accomplishments, look at their maniacal frothing hatred of Sarah Palin. But for her politics and faith, she is the complete and perfect embodiment of the feminist fantasy of a fully empowered woman with a career and a family who can do everything a man can do and look great doing it. Consider as well their attitude towards Bill Clinton, the serial sexual abuser of women – it is one of complete adulation and standing offers of fellatio. Feminism is not about feminism – it’s Marxism in drag, and so conservatives are evil incarnate even if they would otherwise be feminist heroines, and liberals can do no wrong, even if they are serial sexual abusers of powerless women. Feminists toe the liberal line with the discipline of Stalinists, first cheering the Hitler-Stalin pact until the day after Operation Barbarossa, when they did an immediate 180 to denounce Hitler.

      Consider further their vitriolic denunciation of being sexualized, and their recent embrace of being sluts. Which is it, for crying out loud?

      Feminists discredited themselves. Conservatives are not responsible for the feminist freak show merely because they pointed it out.

      • Jaynie59

        Bravo.

    • Afghan Whig

      “It’s not about women at all, it’s about liberalism.” That about sums it up.

  • Guest

    If feminists don’t want to be viewed as caricatures who “encourage women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians”, I have some suggestions for them:

    1) Stop writing anti-marriage, pro-divorce books. Re-examine the radical belief that it is somehow “fair” for women to expect to have equality of rights, while not also accepting the obligations and responsibilities that go with adulthood.

    2) Stop promoting abortion (or at the very least set some limits on those who, like Barbara Boxer and Pres. Obama, have defended ever-expanding limits, to the point of defending after-birth ‘abortion’). Also, reconsider the sexual double standard that justifies abortion in the first place: what is “equal” about a situation where men are expected to be responsible sexually, and not go around making babies if they don’t want to be a dad, while an entirely different standard applies to women?

    3) Stop glamorizing “witchcraft” and stop trying to rewrite paganism to make it some sort of vehicle to express your fear and loathing of Christianity. Real pagans held primitive, violent, superstitious beliefs – and, yes, they really did practice human sacrifice. If you want to pretend you’re one of them, then don’t get mad when people take you at your word, and treat you like a horrible person; it’s not within your power to make paganism be something nice. It’s not yours to decide what it “ought” to mean to be a druid. If you want to make up a new, soft, feelgood religion that combines 18th century Enlightenment philosophical concepts, 19th-century Romanticism, and 20th century ideals and fantasies to create a vision of nature worth worshiping, that’s fine – but what honest reason is there for claiming some right to pretend your new belief system has anything at all to do with the pagan beliefs that existed before Christianity?

    4) Tell the prominent feminists who have been actively promoting lesbianism to stop doing so. We’re told that whether you’re lesbian or not is biological, not a choice, so why have so many feminists promoted it as a lifestyle choice, arguing quite literally in some cases that women can or even do have a better quality of life when they remove males from their life?

    In other words, if feminists don’t want to be viewed as a caricature, they have to stop behaving like that caricature. The fellow who said feminists “encourage women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians” was accurately describing what then-prominent feminists like Starhawk were actually saying at the time he made the comment.

    • percynjpn

      Well said!

  • guest

    exposing the frailty and narrow political minority agenda of radical feminism was surely an unintended consequence of these peoples actions . But it is welcome nevertheless.
    Right thinking Americans, who grow up, mature and move on with the passage of time readily embrace fairness and equality for all genders races and ideologies,

    We are all ready when we are ready and things always shift and change

  • Renatius Barton

    Feminism is dead as an issue. Look around. How many women are in prominent positions in every aspect of life. Blatant, vicious, aggressive prejudice is now directed toward white men.

    • JohnJuan

      Agreed. There is a move afoot toward the feminization of men (in the media and elsewhere). For example, the term “metrosexual. Say what? Women today want a man that IS a man and not soft and whimpy. Don’t believe it? Ask a woman (hetreosexual, of course).

  • JohnJaun

    Seriously? What has happened (imho) is that women have lived the lie of feminism for the past 20+ years and their daughters who were raised in day cares while mom pursued her career, etc., as a “good and faithful” feminist have looked back on their own lives and realized as they cam into child-bearing years that this life of feminism was a lie. They have realized the negative affect on their own lives and have decided that there is a better way. They have seen the destructiveness of the the feminist way and are walking away from it and “choosing” to raise their own children and not leave it to “the village”. Of course, this idea will never see the light of day in any of the LSM outlets. I have read and heard plenty through alternative media sources. As the old saying goes, you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Rush and others may have helped it along, but not in the way that this article suggests. It has been through educating people on the realities and the hidden agendas of this ‘movement”. The women of today have made up their own minds and not mindlessly followed an empty and hopelessly failed ideology.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TIU4XR76CGJFSUG5WPZDFUGMUY HenryC

    Excuse me the only reason the caricatures work is the give a outline of the stupidity of the radical form of feminism. Sure, there has been a lot of advancement for women, but radical feminism is NOT responsible for it. Women who study hard, and go to work every day are.

  • Afghan Whig

    Distorted? As what, gynocentric
    hard-leftists? Also,it’s just not conservatives that lampoon feminists.
    Feminists are one of the few liberal groups that are routinely mocked
    throughout all of popular culture. The image of a grim, overzealous feminist
    can be found in movies such as P.C.U., not exactly a paean to conservatism.

  • Dantes

    Who Needs Feminism?” spawned from a class Seidman taught at Duke in the spring called “Women in the Public Sphere.” It focused on women’s activism across the United States, and students were encouraged to develop a project with the intent of promoting social change.

    Good example of a worthless class that leads to worthless degrees in worthless subjects which serve to line the pockets of education bureaucrats and BS promoters like this professor. How’s that 6 figure debt for you womyn studies majors workin’ out for ya?

  • RobL_v2

    Perhaps radical feminism is on the decline because they are a bunch of raving, hating radical loons!

    Lecture to Professor (please take notes) you are a crackpot.

  • Janetoo

    Did feminists see the recent poll which found more and more young women want to be stay home moms? Young women have seen what feminism IS and they don’t like it.

  • ChuckNoland

    If one was to suggest that all women are bad at math or they are all too emotional you would be called a stereotyping sexist. But if one is a leftist and suggest all women adhere to the same group of leftist political beliefs called “women’s issues” you are not steryotyping.

  • Bob

    “Guest” below said it all. What I don’t understand is why people like Seidman still have a forum. Their position is self deluded. As Guest points out.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MYEQXWLBO2ABLQD4SICBSENOOU JohnS

    2 words to refute this: Sandra Fluke

  • http://twitter.com/kangpin Anthony Kang

    The “wage gap” is an indubitable lie that does not stand up to even the most cursory of analyses. And the fact that something like that can be a KEY platform of this certain segment of the political population provides tremendous insight into the mind and credibility of modern-day feminists and liberals in general. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/the_wage_gap_myth.html

    “President Obama says he’s in favor of equal pay. Does he practice what
    he preaches? Not according to my calculations from 2012 pay data
    published by the White House. I found that women staffers there were
    paid 91 cents on a man’s dollar — if one calculates the figure,
    incorrectly, based on simple averages by gender. This is presumably
    because female staffers in these offices were not as senior as male
    staffers, or they held different types of positions, just as in the
    workforce as a whole.” http://articles.marketwatch.com/2012-07-26/commentary/32859540_1_gender-wage-women-staffers-higher-paying-fields

  • silvereagle

    Rachel Seidman: szopos kurva

  • hate hater

    what is wrong with treating everyone fairly rather than favoring one group over another?