Chills speech when ‘education’ team directly intervenes
An evolving definition of âbiasâ at the University of Oregon is at the forefront of a critical evaluation of the bias response teamâs performance and mission that was commissioned by faculty.
Rechristened the âBias Education and Response Teamâ last year as its activities were undergoing scrutiny in the media for potentially chilling speech, the BERT may get more than a cosmetic facelift under the University Senate task forceâs recommendations.
The final report by the task force, which spent several months reviewing the BERT, pays particular attention to how the teamâs activities may interfere in the classroom and duplicate the work of other campus organizations.
Such concerns drove the creation of the task force in August, when the Senate said ânational coverageâ of the team had shined a light on âthe potential for negative effects on free and open classroom discussions.â
Its goal? To âwork with the UO administration to ensure that the BRT functions so as to encourage both academic freedom and inclusivity.â
Statistics jump around, are missing
The report catalogs how the team has changed since its founding in 1999 in response to a âclassroom incident involving racial stereotyping and threats of sexual violence.â
The phrases ââbias-related crimesâ and âhate crimesâ were often used interchangeablyâ in the teamâs original charter, and as of 2003 it still said âvulgarityâ and âpersonally destructiveâ remarks constituted bias.
Even that low threshold had fallen by 2007, when the team judged bias as âanything ⌠you find discriminatory or offensive.â Such words or behavior did not necessarily violate campus rules, either.
MORE: Only thing wrong with UO’s bias response team? The name
Bias incident reports seem to jump wildly year-to-year. The biggest year was 2004-2005, with 92 reports, followed by 2014-2015 with 85 incidents.
But the reportâs graph is missing several years of statistics: nothing between 2000 and fall 2002, nor the 2007-08, 2010-11 or 2012-13 academic years. There are no statistics provided for the past two academic years, perhaps because the task force says it reviewed bias-team annual reports 2000-2015.
What the task force can say with confidence is that âa large majorityâ of reported incidents donât come from the classroom, but rather the residence hall.
‘May be seen as a form of coercion’
BERTâs evolving definition of bias âtransforms the perspective from which bias is measured,â the task force said.
This raises concerns that classroom dynamics could be affected if BERT continues to âdirectly intervene,â because âany classroom exchange may be categorized as âbiasâ and therefore subject to administrative review, regardless of context or intent.â
According to the report, when an incident is reported to the BERT, it âaccept[s] the reporterâs interpretation of events without judgment.â
The team also jumbles together reports of vastly different seriousness without distinguishing among them, according to the task force.
During one academic year, a professor penalizing a student for a class absence was treated the same as swastika graffiti and sexual assaults: all categorized as âbiasâ and âsubject to intervention ⌠without a clear set of guidelines.â
MORE: Student paper investigated for giving ‘less coverage’ to trans students
The report pointed to incidents over the years in which BERT could have infringed on academic freedom and intellectual diversity, including a complaint against the student newspaper for not giving enough coverage to transgender students:
Direct engagement with the student press raises unique considerations. The University of Oregonâs policies on Academic Freedom and Freedom of Speech and Inquiry make clear that academic freedom extends to other forms of speech, including the student press. While members of the BERT may maintain that such a discussion is merely educational, a formal visit from an administrative organization may itself be seen as a form of coercion and an attempt to influence editorial policy.
The team also received complaints, sometimes anonymously, against co-workers and faculty that BERT in turn reported to their supervisors:
At worst, such involvement can cause potential damage to an individualâs reputation and career on the basis of accusation alone and without the benefit of an open and transparent process. The threat of involving oneâs direct supervisor in educational conversations has the clear potential to have a conservative effect on classroom interactions as direct contact from an administrative delegate may be seen as a form of coercion.
Stay out of employment law
The team is also simply redundant and steps on other organizationsâ toes, the task force found. Its work âas envisioned in its original missionâ is also being done by the Title IX office, the Office of Affirmative Action & Equal Opportunity and, perhaps most directly, the new âRespectâ portal, whose mission is âWorking together to end bias and hate.â
The report recommends making âsubstantive changesâ to the teamâs âprofessional practices.â
It should secure private information, refer harassment and discrimination cases to Title IX and affirmative-action offices, stop intervening in classrooms via âfacilitated conversations with faculty, staff and their supervisors,â and stay out of employment law, which âshould be handled by Human Resources, not BERT.â
MORE: Police investigate ‘hate crime’ of believing in two genders
The College Fix unsuccessfully sought comment from the administration multiple times over the last week for this report.
A public relations official told The Fix to contact a generic news email, which in turn passed the request to communications specialist Emily Halnon, who said she would forward the request to the Office of the Dean of Students, led by Kris Winter. That office did not reply.
Senate President Bill Harbaugh, an economics professor who theorized at his watchdog blog UO Matters that the BRT was renamed because of a pending story in the local Register-Guard, did not respond to repeated phone and email queries for comment. His voicemail says he does not check messages.
MORE:Â âSnow penisâ from snowstorm is âbias incidentâ at UMich
MORE: Prof ‘physically abused’ by South Korea takes on UO’s bias team
MORE: UO drops charges against student for lame sex joke
Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter
IMAGES: dslaven/Shutterstock, jejim/Shutterstock
Please join the conversation about our stories on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, MeWe, Rumble, Gab, Minds and Gettr.