Top Obama Campaign Contributors This Year: Professors

by Danielle Charette - Swarthmore College on November 5, 2012

Who beat Microsoft and Google billionaires this year as the top contributors to Barack Obama’s re-election campaign? None other than professors up and down the state of California.

Employees and faculty affiliated with the University of California system came in as the top Obama donor in the 2012 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The group’s OpenSecrets.org website notes employees and educators associated with the massive, 10-campus system gave nearly $1.1 million to the president’s re-election bid, beating out employees at companies such as Microsoft, Google and Kaiser Permanente.

While the list of the top 20 donors to the Obama campaign puts the UC system on top, it’s not the only university on there. Harvard University came in fifth place at about $600,000 in donations, with Stanford University right behind in seventh place at $532,000.

Not to be outdone, Columbia University came in at ninth place with $411,000, followed by the University of Chicago at about $325,000 and in thirteenth place. Finally, University of Michigan came in at seventeenth place with $308,000 given to Obama.

The figures tally donations made during the 2012 election cycle and are based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Oct. 25, according to the website. Donations of $200 or more are tracked.

In reporting this data, the Center for Responsive Politics emphasized the “organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations’ PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.”

And while there’s several universities on the center’s top 20 list, it’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Take the University of Iowa – ground zero for a lawsuit watched nationally alleging bias against conservatives. Its affiliates gave most of their campaign donations to Democrats this election season, the website’s data shows.

Since 2011, 83 percent of all campaign donations by employees and faculty affiliated with the University of Iowa went to Democrats, the OpenSecrets.org website shows. In the presidential race, University of Iowa’s affiliates doled out $95,016 to Barack Obama compared to just $10,900 for Mitt Romney.

A similar pattern can be established at universities across the nation, according to OpenSecrets.org:

At the University of Wisconsin, only 4.5 percent of faculty and employee donations went to Republicans. Donations at the University of Connecticut amount to just 3 percent for Republicans. There’s no indication that things are better at private schools, either. At Yale University, the GOP received a paltry 3.5 percent of 2011-12 political largesse.

Lopsided contributions like these are the norm in public and private colleges across the country, and it’s part of the reason why frustration over faculty bias in American higher education continues to mount, especially this election season.

Making matters worse, it equates to political discrimination in the classroom subsidized by taxpayers. The battle over the issue is far from over.

Last month, legal writing instructor Teresa Wagner took the University of Iowa Law School to federal court over claims that she’d been passed-over for tenure because of her pro-life activism. Wagner’s lawyers alleged that more than 90 percent of the law school faculty were registered Democrats, with “political views [that] are directly adverse to those held by the plaintiff.”

On Oct. 24, Wagner’s case was declared a mistrial, when the federal judge found the jury deadlocked. The Iowa City Press-Citizen clarified that the jury rejected Wagner’s First Amendment complaint but split on the question of whether or not the law school had properly upheld Wagner’s equal protection rights. The judge indicated that, barring a settlement, the case would be retried.

Although specific documentation of discrimination can be difficult to establish in cases like Wagner’s, public campaign contribution disclosures shed light on just how prominent the bias is throughout academia.

Private citizens, of course, are free to donate their salaries to campaigns of their choosing, but the one-sided spending is alarming nonetheless. Money speaks, and universities’ campaign spending speaks of underrepresented conservatives.

Fix contributor Danielle Charette is a student at Swarthmore College.

IMAGE: By 401(k) 2012/Flickr

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

Help The College Fix thrive. Click here to make a tax-deductible donation!
Share this article:
  • Isreal Rules

    Please help us vote this useless anti-american, anti-christian, anti-us military, muslum loving, waste of breathing space out of office!!!

  • pdard

    Interesting that the Republican party which is explicitly anti-intellectual and anti-science in conjunction with the liberal bias of facts is shocked by this. I would be shocked if it were otherwise.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Googie-Bergdorff/1015822103 Googie Bergdorff

      You’re amusing.

  • David Dudeny

    How shocking. The UC system has 187,000 employees, and these employees gave a total of $1.1 million — an average of less than $6 per employee — to Obama. You might as well have asked: “What institution has the largest number of employees?” That 187,000 employees “beat out” (i.e., gave more money) than the nearest competitor — Microsoft, which has only 54,000 employees — is stunning. Not.

  • james lee

    I guess they have a lousy biology class if they cannot tell the difference between a man and a woman.. genetically he is a man… physically he is a man… but by law if he thinks he is a woman and changes his name to a womans name that makes him a woman??? this Justice system and Educational system of ours has to make the other nations laugh at us… just how biologically stupid does a nation become.. be it educators, or government officials? eventually i bet he will find himself with no manhood to dangle around due to either something he does or a parent overly protective of their child. so how long before a woman declares the same thing. has her name changed to a males name and declares she is a guy? and goes to the mans locker room??.. .they already had a boy in a highschool on the news years ago claiming he was a female, even eventually dressed the part and wanted /demanded to go the bathroom in the girls bathroom… and he was allowed to… to much disgust of parents… eventually his parents removed him from the school due to other parents pressure on his parents. it should be a law. if you want claim to be a man or woman if you do not have the physical properties associated with that gender you cannot cross the lines in a public forum;, ie schools, colleges, etc… afford the surgery to make the necessary change then fine.. but do not expect the government to pay for it… although there IS probably a loophole to have that paid for anyways..