Original. Student reported. Your daily dose of Right-minded news and commentary from across the nation
Harvard creates a blue-ribbon committee so it can safely punish male-only clubs

For every situation in life, there is an instructive scene from The Simpsons.

When Harvard leaders suddenly suspended a policy that punished members of single-sex student organizations such as final clubs – right before faculty could have voted to overturn the policy as a gross violation of freedom of association and shared governance – they announced they were creating a review committee to re-evaluate the policy.

The obvious parallel from the Simpsons universe is when Springfield Mayor “Diamond” Joe Quimby promises a “blue-ribbon committee” to deal with a spike in looting.

And just like Quimby’s evasive maneuver, Harvard leaders got what they wanted in the short term: Policy opponent Harry Lewis, who introduced the faculty resolution against the administration, withdrew it soon after, The Harvard Crimson reported.

MOREHarvard dean chickens out of blacklisting male-only club members

The professor, a former dean of Harvard College, released a letter praising his newly cautious leaders but warning them not to rubber-stamp a new fascist regime on students:

[W]ith the immediate threat of injury and trespass on faculty rights [by ignoring shared governance] somewhat tempered, it would not be a good use of Faculty time to debate a matter which may become operationally moot. If the policy is reaffirmed without adequate revision, however, I expect that the motion, or one similar to it, will be reintroduced.

Meanwhile, one of the lawyers working with a male-only final club against Harvard’s machinations has already seen through the BS of this Ivy League blue-ribbon committee.

MORE: Harvard is ready to blacklist 1 in 4 students for their associations

Harvey Silverglate, co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told The Crimson the review committee was a “pernicious procedural trick”:

“It’s a classic example of a situation where the administration has changed the appearances but not the substance,” he said. “I’ve looked at it, and turned it upside down and inside out, and every time I look at it it says the same thing to me: ‘we’ve decided this, but for window dressing we’re going to give the faculty and students a role. But that role will not change what we do.’”

Let’s see if the Harvard community – which probably still likes having the freedom to choose their friends – is as skeptical as Silverglate or as credulous as Springfield, which re-elected Quimby several times.

MORE: Harvard prez reconsiders ‘blacklist’ policy after faculty revolt

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Cindy Lee/Shutterstock

About the Author
Associate Editor
Greg spent several years as a technology policy reporter and editor for Warren Communications News in Washington, D.C., and guest host on C-SPAN’s “The Communicators.” He co-founded the alternative newspaper PUNCH and served as a reporter, editor and columnist for The Falcon at Seattle Pacific University.

Add to the Discussion

Sign up for The College Fix's newsletterWe promise we won't barrage your inbox or share your information. We just hit you up with some great campus news about twice a week.