fbpx
Original. Student reported. Your daily dose of Right-minded news and commentary from across the nation
Academic freedom has limits inside the classroom, law professor says

‘The university is the one that holds the First Amendment,’ professor says

An associate teaching professor in University of Washington’s School of Law told the campus paper that professors only have First Amendment rights in their private capacities, not in the classroom.

He provided further comments to The College Fix in response to an inquiry.

“The university is the one that holds the First Amendment,” Professor Theodore Myhre (pictured) told The Daily. The student newspaper wrote a follow-up article about the controversy surrounding Professor Stuart Reges’ refusal to use the university’s land acknowledgement statement on his syllabus.

“Its participants — the people who are part of the university — actually don’t hold the First Amendment right,” Myhre stated. “You do in your private capacity, but you do not hold it in your role as a member of the university community.”

“The faculty is not squashing free speech,” the law professor told the newspaper. “The faculty is actually trying to protect and empower the learning environment to be productive and effective.”

University officials, the professor said, can limit speech that could “disrupt the learning environment.”

He expanded on his comments to The Fix.

He said:

A public university holds the first amendment free speech right and grants back to members of its community through its faculty code and student conduct code academic freedom. So when members of the university are acting within their university capacity, that is the structure. They can exercise academic freedom within the limits of the relevant code. An example of a limit to academic freedom is when an impermissible disruption of the learning environment occurs during class–that kind of disruption wouldn’t be protected by academic freedom policies.

He said universities can place limits on academic freedom when it comes to the syllabus or textbook selection. This is why he believes Professor Reges can be limited in how he presents the land acknowledgement.

“The faculty member has discretion as to how to deliver the material provided that the manner and method of teaching don’t violate the faculty code,” Professor Myrhe said in his email. “Usually, faculty choose their own texts and often create their own syllabus which includes several required provisions—but that isn’t a right so much as a common practice.”

“First amendment and academic freedom cases occurred throughout the 20th century all over the country, especially during the very conservative 1950s and the McCarthy era,” the law professor told The Fix. “The structure discussed emerged from all those cases.”

He said he wants more people to understand how the law operates, whether they agree with it.

“[I]t’s important to me that folks understand law, especially since it’s not usually taught in primary and secondary education,” he said. “No matter one’s opinion on whether the law is right or wrong as a policy statement, it’s important to understand how it works.”

MORE: College Fix editor discusses Reges controversy

IMAGE: University of Washington

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

Please join the conversation about our stories on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, MeWe, Rumble, Parler, Gab, Minds, Gettr and Telegram.

About the Author
Associate Editor
Matt has previously worked at Students for Life of America, Students for Life Action and Turning Point USA. While in college, he wrote for The College Fix as well as his college newspaper, The Loyola Phoenix. He holds a B.A. from Loyola University-Chicago and a M.A. from the University of Nebraska-Omaha. He lives in northwest Indiana with his family.