BUZZ
LEGAL

English professors praise judge for citing poem in immigration ruling against Trump

Share to:
More options
Email Reddit Telegram

A judge's gavel; Anna Stills/Shutterstock IMAGE: Anna Stills/Shutterstock

Key Takeaways

  • Judge Sara Ellis cited Carl Sandburg's poem 'Chicago' in her ruling that restricted the Trump administration's effort to curb illegal immigration, highlighting what she sees as a contrast between the administration's negative portrayal of the city and its vibrant reality.
  • English professors from Northwestern and the University of Chicago praised the judge's use of poetry, emphasizing how it reflects American values rooted in immigration and resilience.
  • The ruling prohibits federal immigration agents from employing forceful tactics against non-threatening individuals.

English professors at two universities praised a judge for citing a poem in a ruling that restricted the Trump administration’s efforts to curb illegal immigration. 

At the start of her ruling, U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis recited Carl Sandburg’s entire 1914 poem “Chicago,” famous for celebrating the city’s “working-class roots,” and drawing attention to “outsiders’ perceptions” of the town, according to the Chicago Sun Times

Ellis contrasted Sandburg’s proud portrayal of Chicago with the administration’s perception of the city.

She said “the [Trump administration] would have people believe instead that the Chicagoland area is in a vice hold of violence, ransacked by rioters and attacked by agitators.”

“This is a vibrant place, brimming with vitality and hope, striving to move forward from its complicated history,” Ellis said.

In response, Northwestern University English Professor Ivy Wilson said he was “both astounded and mesmerized.”

Wilson also referenced a line in the poem about the city “building, breaking, rebuilding.” 

“That notion is really the heart of not just how Sandburg is thinking about Chicago, but really the best of what we would call an American sensibility,” Wilson said. 

“And that American sensibility is not nativist, but it’s really built from the backs of immigrants, all of us as immigrants,” he said. 

University of Chicago English Professor Srikanth Reddy also praised the decision.

“To read a poem as part of a justification or a rationale for a judgment of this importance shows how art can express the complexities of what we’re living through in ways that maybe other forms of speech can’t,” he said.

Reddy also said the poem depicts the “complex messiness” of the city. 

“And I think what the judge was saying was, this is a city, like any great American city, that has problems and a dynamic population that is debating and thinking and struggling to work through those problems. And at the same time, there are things we will resist in order to remain true to our values and our diversity,” he said.

Judge Ellis’ ruling, issued last week, bans federal immigration agents from “issuing a crowd dispersal order,” “using hands-on physical force,” or “using riot control weapons” such as tear gas against those who do not pose an immediate threat. 

MORE: ‘War zone’: Violent protest erupts outside UC Berkeley prior to TPUSA event