fbpx
Original. Student reported. Your daily dose of Right-minded news and commentary from across the nation
Department of Education will include sexual orientation, gender identity in Title IX protections

The U.S. Department of Education announced on Wednesday that it would be including sexual orientation and gender identity in the protections provided by Title IX, the federal law that prohibits discrimination in education on the basis of sex.

The Education Department’s decision overturns the policy of former President Donald Trump’s department, which did not include such protections in its definition of sex discrimination.

In making the announcement, the department cited last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, issued one year ago this week, in which the Supreme Court decided one could not discriminate against a person based on their sexual orientation or gender identity without discriminating against that person based on sex.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the right for LGBTQ+ people to live and work without fear of harassment, exclusion, and discrimination – and our LGBTQ+ students have the same rights and deserve the same protections,” said Education Secretary Miguel Cardona in a statement accompanying the decision. “I’m proud to have directed the Office for Civil Rights to enforce Title IX to protect all students from all forms of sex discrimination,” he said.

The decision to include sexual orientation and transgender protections under the umbrella of Title IX should not come as a surprise. In March, President Joe Biden issued an executive order “Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free from Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity.” In this order, he directed the Education Secretary to:

“account for intersecting forms of prohibited discrimination that can affect the availability of resources and support for students who have experienced sex discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of race, disability, and national origin; to account for the significant rates at which students who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) are subject to sexual harassment, which encompasses sexual violence; to ensure that educational institutions are providing appropriate support for students who have experienced sex discrimination; and to ensure that their school procedures are fair and equitable for all.”

The Bostock Supreme Court decision relied upon by the Education Department effectively said discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity fell under the rubric of “sex discrimination” because individuals of one sex were being discriminated against for behavior that wouldn’t be punished if were done by another sex.

For example, the court ruled, a biological man who dresses as a woman should not be punished because a woman wouldn’t be punished for dressing like a woman. Similarly, a man who dates another man should not be punished because a woman who dates a man wouldn’t face any sanction.

“An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex,” wrote Justice Neil Gorsuch in the decision, employing a strict textual interpretation.

“The Department of Education strives to provide schools with the support they need to create learning environments that enable all students to succeed, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation,” said Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Suzanne Goldberg.

“Equity in education means all students have access to schools that allow them to learn and thrive in all aspects of their educational experience,” said Goldberg. “As part of our mission to protect all students’ civil rights, it is essential that OCR acts to eliminate discrimination that targets LGBTQ+ students.”

However, critics note that Title IX has often been used on campus to punish male students with little to no due process, allowing schools to set up “kangaroo courts” to prosecute cases related to sexual misconduct. Expanding the definition of the law, they say, could open up a whole new avenue for students to find themselves before campus tribunals with little opportunity to defend themselves.

In fact, Goldberg herself has been accused of being inconsistent when it comes to Title IX enforcement. Just last week, Yale cardiology and medical Professor Raymond Givens said that Goldberg did not properly investigate complaints of sexual assault while serving as the university’s executive vice president for University Life.

In a complaint filed with the New York Attorney General in April, Givens said he had spoken to several student sexual assault survivors “who all tell a consistent story of the university obstructing their attempts to obtain justice.”

“Striking grad student workers are asking for the university to allow a neutral and independent party to handle grievances related to sex assault and gender-based harassment, which the university is resisting,” he said.

Read the full Department of Education Title IX announcement here.

MORE: Women’s rights activist praises DeVos Title IX rules for putting the Constitution over ‘therapeutic interests’

IMAGE: YASAMIN JAFARI TEHRANI/Shutterstock

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

Please join the conversation about our stories on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, MeWe, Rumble, Parler, Gab, Minds and Telegram.

About the Author
Senior Reporter
Christian focuses on investigative, enterprise and analysis reporting. He is the author of "1916: The Blog" and has spent time as a political columnist at USA Today, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and National Review Online. His op-eds have been featured in The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, City Journal, Weekly Standard and National Review. He has also been a frequent guest on political television and radio shows. He holds a master’s degree in political science from Marquette University and lives in Madison, Wisconsin.