Notre Dame

Via USA Today:

Star linebacker Manti Te’o, whose relationship with a deceased girlfriend was central to the narrative of his Heisman Trophy campaign and Notre Dame’s unbeaten regular season, was the victim of an elaborate hoax, the school said Wednesday after a Deadspin story alleged the woman never existed.

In a statement … Te’o said he had developed an emotional relationship a woman he had met online and was “the victim of what was apparently someone’s sick joke.”

… Te’o had talked openly during the season about his supposed relationship with a former Stanford student named Lennay Kekua … (who) was said to have lost her battle with leukemia on Sept. 12, just hours after Te’o learned that his 72-year old grandmother had passed away.

The story of how Te’o dealt with massive personal tragedy became front and center in his rise to national consciousness. …

Te’o's statement contradicted the suggestion by Deadspin that he may have been in on the hoax. … “We know it’s a hoax… The only question out there is exactly what Manti knew about it,” Timothy Burke, one of the authors of the piece on Deadspin, said during an appearance Wednesday on CBS Radio.”

Click here to read the full USA Today article.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

 

{ 0 comments }

When Laura Hollis, a Notre Dame University business and law professor, looks at America’s path forward, she cannot help but see a dead end.

“Many people say to me, ‘If it gets worse than this, I’m not sure we can survive it,’ and I’m inclined to agree with them,” Hollis said in an interview with The College Fix. “It’s never been as bad as it is now.”

Hollis, who in addition to her professorship is a popular conservative columnist and political commentator, is the author of a post-election column titled “Post Mortem” that went viral across America. It was reposted on many websites, spread like wildfire across social media sites, and emailed far and wide, landing in mom-and-pop inboxes across the nation.

In fact, just as recently as Dec. 28, the popular left-leaning political blog Daily Kos posted an “open letter to Laura Hollis” denouncing her piece.

This ongoing whirlwind of a world wide web debate was prompted by Hollis’ Nov. 8 column, which analyzed the state of the union the day after President Barack Obama was re-elected.

It argued, among other things, that: conservatives are outnumbered; they’re losing the culture war; too many Americans are immature, seeking only self-gratification; and the so-called Republican War on Women played a role in the election outcome.

“America is on a horrific bender; has been for some time now,” Hollis wrote. “The warning signs of our fiscal profligacy and culture of lack of personal responsibility are everywhere – too many to mention. We need only look at other countries which have gone the route we are walking now to see what is in store. … I see the country I love headed toward its own ‘rock bottom,’ and I cannot seem to reach those who are taking it there.”

In an interview this week with The College Fix, Hollis said feedback she’s received from that piece has led her to believe millions of Americans feel as if they have no voice. But the answer, she argued, is not to cower in the corner and give up.

“Speak up,” Hollis said. “Because being polite does not mean being silent.”

First and foremost, the culture war must to be addressed, she said. It’s time to stop worrying about stepping on people’s toes or hurting people’s feelings, she said.

Some Republican and conservative commentators argued after the election the solution to regain the White House, Congress and the country is to become more moderate, acquiesce to the social norms promulgated by the Left.

Bad idea, Hollis said.

“We have to decide we need to change the tone and tenor of culture in the country,” Hollis said. “In order to change the culture, you have to be a part of the culture.”

Take, for example, the alleged War on Women. During the presidential campaign, women’s rights discussions served as a façade for something more sinister, she said. What appeared to be a discourse about access to birth control was really about expanding abortion services and physician-assisted suicide, Hollis said.

“I’m pro-better choice—all choices are not equal,” Hollis said. “If my father is suffering from advanced dementia, I don’t have the right to smother him with a pillow.”

Hollis said advances in science have provided new and startling information about life from conception through natural death that every American should learn. This is one example of the kinds of things that could help turn the culture war tide in conservatives’ favor.

Hollis said “the left” has become politically adept at demonizing people, but it is important for all Americans to understand everyone wants to make things better, she said.

While Hollis’ first point in her “Post-Mortem” work declared Americans who champion free enterprise are outnumbered by those who want free stuff, she said that did not mean throw in the towel.

“No matter where you are, that can be ground-zero for changing things,” Hollis said.

Fix contributor Ryan Lovelace is a student at Butler University.

Click here to read Hollis’ entire Post-Mortem piece.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

 

IMAGE: Dave Hosford

{ 0 comments }

Anticipation of a hard fought BCS title game proved unfounded last night as Alabama rolled right over the Irish of Notre Dame. After the Tide took a 28-0 lead in the first half, it was clear that the luck of the Irish had run out.

Notre Dame’s unbeaten miracle season would end, not in national championship glory, but in the shame and disappointment of a humiliating 42-14 defeat.

Alabama dominated physically, and Notre Dame’s offense could not get the ball moving against Nick Saban’s defense.

Meanwhile, Notre Dame could do nothing to stop Alabama running back Eddie Lacy, who powered up and down the field on his way to a game MVP performance with 140 yds and a touchdown on the ground, averaging 7 yds per carry. Lacy also caught a pass for a touchdown.

In the end, Irish fans were left deflated but hopeful that this year’s return to national title contention after a years-long competitive drought can only mean good things for the team’s future, even though hopes for a title were left unfulfilled for now.

Last night’s win makes it three national championships in four years for Alabama under head coach Nick Saban.

The Tide take home yet another crystal ball BCS trophy, leaving no doubt of who was the best team in college football this season, and leaving one word on everyone’s mind–dynasty.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

Image: Nikonmadness / Wikimedia Commons

{ 0 comments }

An ABC News investigation has revealed that a controversial painkiller typically used on patients who recently underwent surgery is often injected into football players before games, making them feel invincible but putting them at risk.

That drug, Toradol, is used at several big-name college football programs across the nation, with many more campuses refusing to disclose to ABC News whether they inject players with the painkiller.

ABC News reports:

The top two college football programs, Notre Dame and Alabama, refused to answer questions from ABC News about the painkiller. They play for the national college championship on Jan. 7.

Controversy surrounding the drug has grown this year following claims by former USC lineman Armond Armstead that he suffered a heart attack after the 2010 season, at age 20, following shots of generic Toradol administered over the course of the season by the team doctor and USC personnel. …

In a lawsuit against the school and the doctor … Armstead claims the school ignored the stated risks of the drug and never told him about them.

“He was a race horse, a prize race horse that needed to be on that field no matter what,” said Armstead’s mother Christa. “Whether that was a risk to him or not.”

Armstead says he and many other USC players would receive injections of what was known only as “the shot” in a specific training room before big games and again at half-time. …

Armstead said the shot made him feel “super human” despite severe ankle, and later shoulder pain, and that without it, he never could have played in big USC games against Notre Dame and UCLA.

“You can’t feel any pain, you just feel amazing,” the former star player said.

Click here to read the entire ABC News report.

Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.

{ 0 comments }

What a surprise: Philosophy graduate students who don’t know what “coercion” means. From Inside Higher Ed:

At the University of Notre Dame, which sued the Department of Health and Human Services over the mandate in May, three philosophy graduate students have started a petition opposing the lawsuit.

But rather than arguing for birth control on its secular merits — as a letter from the faculty at John Carroll University to its president did in February, calling contraception “central to the health and well-being of women and children” — the petition takes a theological tack, arguing that the mandate might not conflict with Catholic teachings at all.

It goes on to subtly criticize the university for emphasizing the birth control controversy rather than working to develop more family-friendly policies.

The petition relies on a philosophical precept, the doctrine of double effect, which argues that in some cases, it is permissible to cause harm in the process of achieving something good under certain conditions, and suggests that insurance coverage for contraception might not conflict with Catholic teaching under that doctrine. Its writers go on to argue that an exception to the mandate would be coercive for non-Catholic students and employees (or to Catholic students and employees who choose not to follow the church’s position on birth control).

“By requiring its employees to purchase additional insurance or to pay out of pocket, thereby placing a not insignificant financial burden on them, Notre Dame is effectively utilizing indirect coercion and imposing its religious beliefs and practices on its employees,” the petition’s authors wrote.

But the employees are not forced to work for the university, so it’s hardly coercion. The employer determines the conditions of employment, and the employee has the option of rejecting the terms and leaving the job. Coercion comes into play when an entity must comply with a demand or face direct physical or legal harm. Consider two situations:

1). A man offers to pay you to cut his lawn. He is only willing to pay you, however, if you wear a hat.

2). The government passes a law requiring every lawn cutter to wear a hat.

It’s obvious that the first situation is odd, but not coercive. The second, on the other hand, is highly coercive.

But perhaps I’m wrong; after all, I am not a philosophy graduate student.

{ 0 comments }

The University of Notre Dame will join 3 other Catholic universities in suing the Obama administration for requiring them to cover contraception in their health plans, according to Inside Higher Ed:

Colleges, Catholic dioceses, charities and other organizations filed 12 separate lawsuits Monday, alleging that the requirement infringes on their religious freedom. Catholic University of America and St. Francis University also sued, as did Franciscan University of Steubenville, which recently chose to discontinue its student health plan rather than offer insurance covering contraception.

Also on Monday, Ave Maria University announced that it would stop offering student health insurance rather than comply with the federal rules, The News-Press reported.

TCF first reported on lawsuits against the contraception mandate back in January. Read more here.

{ 0 comments }